City
Epaper

Women can be summoned to ED office in FEMA cases: Delhi HC

By IANS | Updated: December 2, 2025 12:25 IST

New Delhi, Dec 2 The Delhi High Court has held that a woman can be summoned to the ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Dec 2 The Delhi High Court has held that a woman can be summoned to the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) office for recording of her statement in FEMA proceedings.

Rejecting the contention that safeguards under Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) apply to such summons, a single-judge Bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna dismissed a writ petition filed by a 53-year-old Canadian citizen, who had challenged an ED summons issued under Section 37 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA).

The petitioner argued that as a woman, she could not be compelled to appear at the ED office and that her statement must be recorded at her residence.

The petition referred to Section 160(1) CrPC, which prevents women from being required to appear at places other than their residence for investigation.

In its decision, the Delhi High Court held that FEMA investigations are civil-administrative proceedings, not criminal inquiries, and therefore, the gender-based protection available under CrPC cannot be invoked.

“Civil Code contains no provision like Section 160 Cr.P.C mandating the recording of the statement of a woman at her residence. The insistence of the petitioner for not appearing before the Authority is, therefore, without any basis,” held Justice Krishna.

“Powers regarding discovery and production of evidence under Section 37 FEMA are analogous to those under Section 131 ITA, which is governed by Civil Code and therefore, Section 160 Cr.P.C. would not be applicable,” added the Delhi High Court.

The petitioner argued that she had already submitted all documents demanded by ED and sought exemption from appearing due to medical issues in the family and gender, further urging the agency to record her statement at her residence.

Concluding that the petition was “without merit”, the Delhi High Court refused to interfere with the summons. “In light of the law discussed above, this court finds no merit in the Writ Petition,” held Justice Krishna, dismissing the petition.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentAnees Bazmee says 'It feels surreal to look back' as Gopi Kishan turns 31

NationalTN steps up final preparations for ‘Karthigai Deepam’ as Tiruvannamalai gears up for massive devotee influx

BusinessBeiruna Brings a New Chapter of Middle Eastern Elegance to Mumbai’s Skyline

NationalPriyanka Chaturvedi writes to RS Chairman demanding withdrawal of ban on 'Jai Hind', 'Vande Mataram'

BusinessAAOMI Makes a Dazzling Debut, Adding a New Pulse to Andheri’s Nightlife

National Realted Stories

National'We discussed visiting Delhi together': Dy CM Shivakumar after breakfast meet with CM Siddaramaiah

NationalRs 770 crore released to Bihar under Jal Jeevan Mission since 2019-20: Centre

NationalWinter Session 2025: Priyanka Chaturvedi Writes to CP Radhakrishnan, Seeks Withdrawal of Circular Banning ‘Jai Hind’ and ‘Vande Mataram’ Slogans

NationalBlot on democracy: Giriraj Singh, others slam Oppn over SIR protests in Parliament

NationalMamata govt trying to keep dead voters in Bengal electoral rolls, claims Suvendu Adhikari