City
Epaper

Agreement to give entire grazing land to reliance for solar project; Villagers move HC, Deposit Rs 5 lakh in appellate bench

By Lokmat Times Desk | Updated: April 6, 2026 22:20 IST

Chhatrapati SambhajinagarVillagers have filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Aurangabad bench of the Mumbai High Court ...

Open in App

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar

Villagers have filed a public interest litigation (PIL) in the Aurangabad bench of the Mumbai High Court challenging Mahavitaran’s decision to allot the entire 20-acre grazing land of Mhasobachi Wadi (Aashti tehsil, Beed District) to Reliance for a solar energy project. The land in question is reserved for grazing over 3,000 livestock.

Following orders from Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Hiten Venegavkar, the petitioners deposited Rs 5 lakh with the bench to prove the bonafide nature of their PIL. The petition requests that the diversion of this grazing land be declared illegal and that the entire land remain reserved for grazing.

-----

Details of the Petition:

In Mhasobachi Wadi, Plot No. 143, approximately 19.50 acres are reserved for grazing over 3,000 livestock. Under the “Mukhyamantri Solar Krishi Vahini Yojana 2.0”, the village had agreed via Gram Panchayat resolution and No Objection Certificate (NOC) to allot 9 acres of land for providing continuous and sustainable electricity to farmers’ irrigation pumps.

However, on March 29, 2024, Reliance and Mahavitaran entered into a direct agreement allocating the entire 20 acres of grazing land for a solar power project. As a result, villagers Dnyaneshwar Shekade and others, through Advocate Janardan Murkute, filed the PIL.

-----

Government Guidelines:

According to the May 28, 2023 government decision, it is the government’s responsibility to provide land for such projects, usually via the District Collector. If government land is unavailable, it may be leased. Under Section 22(A) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Act, grazing land should ideally not be diverted, and alternative land should be considered.

In this case, petitioners claim that the District Collector did not allot any alternative land. Instead, Reliance and Mahavitaran executed a direct agreement without any tender process, which the petitioners contend is illegal.

Open in App

Related Stories

International"Images and stories are completely false": US First Lady Melania Trump denies Epstein links

InternationalForeign Secretary Vikram Misri meets Marco Rubio in Washington; US Secretary of State to visit India next month

InternationalIndia-Sweden holds 8th round of Foreign Office Consultations in New Delhi

International"Will defend itself against terrorists who vows it destruction": Israel denounces Pak Defence Minister's "curse for humanity" remarks

International"Can't be tolerated": Israel rebukes Pakistan Defence Minister as ceasefire hangs by thread

Aurangabad Realted Stories

AurangabadNeglect threatens historic watermill; water theft and naher obstructions reduce supply

AurangabadScour valve at Dhorkin damaged; pipeline testing delayed

AurangabadCity nullahs overflowing with garbage, millions of tonnes accumulated

AurangabadMan booked for rape after backing out of marriage promise

AurangabadYears of abuse, no action: Woman's suicide leads to case against teacher-husband