City
Epaper

Bench rejects pleas of two disqualified Phulambri corporators

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: May 8, 2021 19:20 IST

Aurangabad, May 8:A petition of two corporators of Phulambri municipal council disqualified by the Aurangabad district collector for ...

Open in App

Aurangabad, May 8:

A petition of two corporators of Phulambri municipal council disqualified by the Aurangabad district collector for illegal construction on the land of Waqf Board was rejected by Justice A J Jamadar of the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court.

Yogesh, son of Phulambri corporator Indubai Madhukar Misal and Santosh Jadhav, husband of Dwarkabai Jadhav, had started an illegal construction on Gut no 353 belonging to the Waqf Board. The Waqf officials then conducted a panchnama. In the application filed by Syed Zulfekhar demanded disqualification of corporators Dwarkabai and Indubai for illegal construction.

Tehsildar of Phulambri issued a notice to the husband and son of the corporators. The Waqf authorities also passed an order to stop the construction. Against this backdrop, the district collector declared both the corporators ineligible. The corporators filed an appeal with the ministry of urban development. But their appeal was rejected. Therefore, they had filed a petition in the Aurangabad bench. Panchnama of the place took place.

The corporators claimed that there are no clear boundaries on the land, hence the illegal construction cannot be ascertained. It was requested that the disqualification order be revoked. On behalf of the complainant, adv Ravindra Gore said that the panchnama was not made before the district collector. Therefore, such an argument cannot be accepted in the writ jurisdiction of the High Court.

The boundaries of illegal construction are mentioned in the pending claims of the Waqf authority. Government prosecutors have also said that the orders of the collector and the urban development minister are legal. While dismissing the petition, the court found that the evidence in the case involved the husband and son of the corporators and others involved in the illegal construction. Therefore, the conclusion cannot be changed in the writ jurisdiction and rejected the petition of the corporators. Adv Gore was assisted by Chandrakant Bodkhe.

Tags: Santosh jadhavDwarkabai jadhavBombay High CourtWaqf BoardJustice of bombay high courtBombay high
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiMumbai Pollution: Bombay High Court Calls Clean Air a Fundamental Right, Slams BMC Over Kanjurmarg Stench

MaharashtraMaharashtra: Bombay High Court Suspends Sentence of NCP Leader Manikrao Kokate, Grants Bail in 1995 Cheating and Forgery Case

MumbaiBomb Threats Issued to Bombay High Court and Magistrate Courts in Andheri, Bandra and Esplanade; Search Underway

MumbaiMumbai: Man Attempts Self-Immolation Outside Bombay High Court, Suffers Severe Burns

MaharashtraBombay High Court Recruitment 2025: Notification for 2,381 Vacancies for Clerk, Driver, Peon and Steno; Application From December 15

Aurangabad Realted Stories

AurangabadCandidates file nomination papers amidst fanfare, music

AurangabadWinter of Discontent at BJP office over denial of ticket

AurangabadBJP fields 50 former corporators, 46 new faces to contest elections

Aurangabad1,200 Polling staff served notices for skipping training

AurangabadPolice assure security to industries, women workers in MIDC areas