City
Epaper

HC set aside MAT’s order allowing change of caste category

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: April 26, 2025 23:05 IST

Lokmat News NetworkChhatrapati Sambhajinagar:The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, comprising Justice R G Avachat and ...

Open in App

Lokmat News Network

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar:

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, comprising Justice R G Avachat and Justice Sandipkumar More, has set aside an order by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) that permitted a change in caste category in a Police Sub-Inspector (PSI) application.

Pooja Babasaheb Jadhav had approached MAT seeking correction of a caste category error in her application after the PSI recruitment process had concluded. MAT had granted her request, allowing the change. However, the Maharashtra Public Service Commission (MPSC) challenged this decision by filing a petition in the High Court. Manisha Gusinge, who was allegedly denied selection despite being eligible, also filed an intervention application.

What was the original application?

In her original application for the post of PSI, Pooja Jadhav had mistakenly selected the 'OBC' (Other Backward Class) category. However, she belongs to the 'DT-A' (Denotified Tribe – A) category. Upon realising the error, she requested the MPSC to allow her to correct the caste category, but her request was rejected. Jadhav then challenged the MPSC's decision before the MAT, which ruled in her favour and permitted her to change her caste category. As a consequence of this decision, Manisha Gusinge, who was originally shortlisted, was excluded from the selection list.

Appeal in the High Court

The MPSC filed a petition before the Aurangabad Bench challenging the MAT order. The court observed that Jadhav had filed her petition to alter the caste category at the very last moment of the selection process, which could not be entertained. It further noted that due to her error, a deserving candidate who had successfully cleared the entire selection process, Manisha Gusinge, was unfairly denied selection. Taking this into account, the bench allowed both the MPSC's petition and Gusinge’s intervention application, setting aside MAT’s earlier order. Advocate Mukul Kulkarni represented the MPSC, while Adv Anand Deshpande, assisted by Adv Amol Dabhade, appeared for Manisha Gusinge.

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentManushi Chhillar reveals what went into making Naamumkin from 'Maalik'

EntertainmentSimran Choudhary dedicates ‘Saiyyan Na Maane’ to every girl who has felt unheard

EntertainmentSurveen Chawla calls her 'Criminal Justice 4' role the emotional core of the series

BusinessIndia’s small-cap market value jumps 5X in 7 years, grows at 27.6 pc CAGR: Report

NationalAir India Crash: Vishwas Kumar Ramesh, Sole Survivor Of Flight AI-171 Discharged; Leads Heartbreaking Final Rites for Brother

Aurangabad Realted Stories

AurangabadSecurity guard of Cidco arrested while accepting bribe

AurangabadAction causes cold war between talathi, revenue employees & District Collector

AurangabadCulpable homicide case against five MSEDCL officials

AurangabadFresh uncertainty looms contractual staff in CSMC

AurangabadCSMC school student interacts with union Education Minister in Delhi