City
Epaper

HC states DPCA cannot direct FIR registration

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: April 10, 2025 22:10 IST

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar:The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, comprising Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Rohit Joshi, observed ...

Open in App

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar:

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, comprising Justice Vibha Kankanwadi and Justice Rohit Joshi, observed that the Divisional Level Police Complaint Authority (DPCA) does not have the power to direct the registration of an FIR.

Meanwhile, the bench has instructed the Superintendent of Police (SP), Latur, not to register any FIR against the petitioner police officer based on the authority’s order dated February 21, 2025, until further orders are issued.

What is the original case?

According to the complaint filed by Balegunisa Begum Mohammad Samiyoddin Chaudhary, the issue dates back to October 21, 2020. She alleged that when she went to her field to inspect the removal of a nameplate bearing her name and boundary markers, she was molested and threatened with death. Following this, she went to the Udgir (Rural) Police Station to file a case against 18 accused persons, but the police officer on duty allegedly refused to register her complaint. Even a complaint sent via post was not accepted.

Later on, accepted the complaint after intervention of the Superintendent of Police (SP), did a primary investigation, stated the complainant to DPCA. The complainant Balegunnisa Begum named the Udgir (Rural) Police Station’s police inspector Deepak Kumar Waghmare, API R R Bhole, PSI Tanaji Cherle, PI A B Gharge and PSI Vyanket Kulkarni for not registering the complaint after the High Court’s order and assisting the accused in seeking bail.

DPCA recommends

After judicial inquiry, the DPCA holding responsible the then PI Waghmare and PSI Kulkarni recommended filing an offence against them under Section 199 of BNS. Hence the two police officers through Adv Vijay Latange challenged the order in the High Court. Latange during the hearing pointed out that DPCA failed to follow the principles of natural justice. He mentioned of discrepancies in the woman’s complaint and her statement. To support his argument, he referenced the legal precedent set in the case of "Priya Paul vs. State of Maharashtra & Others."

Open in App

Related Stories

Politics"Do not wish to witness fighting spirit of Tamil Nadu": MK Stalin warns BJP govt over Delimitation Bill

InternationalUK PM Starmer, French President Macron to host global meet on reopening Strait of Hormuz

PoliticsBJP's Annamalai holds election campaign in favour of AIADMK candidate P Kumar, says "NDA created huge wave in Tamil Nadu"

InternationalCeasefire violations reported in Lebanon as Israeli artillery shelling, aerial surveillance continue

PoliticsIf Women's Reservation and Delimitation Bills become law, opposition's voice will be reduced to nothing in this House": Asaduddin Owaisi

Aurangabad Realted Stories

AurangabadFire breaks out near shop at Mondha Flyover; brought under control

AurangabadTatkal tickets vanish in seconds

AurangabadDo not clear bills if trees have not survived: Minister Bhosale

Aurangabad‘This marriage cannot happen’: 61 child marriages prevented in a year

Aurangabad19-year-old dies after speeding bike hits divider in Waluj