City
Epaper

High Court assured of taking action after serving notices to petitioner

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: July 19, 2025 23:10 IST

Lokmat News NetworkChhatrapati Sambhajinagar:The Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Municipal Corporation (CSMC) through its lawyer has stated in the Aurangabad ...

Open in App

Lokmat News Network

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar:

The Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Municipal Corporation (CSMC) through its lawyer has stated in the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court that although the civic administration has marked the property for the road widening, but it will acquire the property of the petitioner and initiate the further process only after serving notice. Hence accepting the statement as an assurance, the bench comprising Justice Manish Pitale and Justice Y G Khobragade disposed of the petition filed by Garware Hi-Tech Films Limited on July 15.

What was the petition?

According to the petition filed through Adv. Girish Naik-Thigale, the petitioner was allotted two plots by MIDC in the Chikalthana Industrial Area in 1975 for industrial construction. As per the approved layout, the petitioner constructed the main industrial building, a compound wall, and a security guard cabin on the allotted plots. After the construction was completed, MIDC also issued a ‘Completion Certificate’. The petitioner has been manufacturing polyester and specialty films at the site for the past five decades (50 years).

The petitioner argued that their property is located within the Chikalthana Industrial Area. As per the law, the authority for “planning and development” of this area, as well as for property acquisition, lies with MIDC, not with the Municipal Corporation. Despite this, on July 8, 2025, without issuing any prior notice, communication, or order, and without giving the petitioner an opportunity to present their side, officials from the municipal corporation, accompanied by police personnel, entered the petitioner’s premises. They marked the company’s compound wall and the security guard cabin with red paint, indicating that the property up to that point would be removed. Adv Suhas Urgunde represented the municipal corporation.

The petitioner claimed that the said marking campaign initiated by the respondents under the guise of “encroachment removal” or “road widening” is illegal.

Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessCM Majhi sets aim to make Odisha the manufacturing hub of India

NationalCM Majhi sets aim to make Odisha the manufacturing hub of India

NationalArmy's first exclusive freight train on USBRL marks breakthrough in advanced winter stocking

EntertainmentIshaan Khatter, Lilly Singh & Kal Penn Support Anita Verma-Lallian’s Film Doin’ It at NYC Gala

AurangabadTwo 18-year-olds end lives in separate hanging incidents; Waluj region stunned

Aurangabad Realted Stories

AurangabadMarathwada still thirsty as political apathy blocks water solutions

AurangabadDistrict receives 94% rainfall so far

Aurangabad‘Sparking’ in new Shivai E-Bus Incident occurred 72 km after leaving city

Aurangabad‘Sparking’ in new Shivai E-Bus Incident occurred 72 km after leaving city

AurangabadNIPM Students’ Chapter inaugurated at Shreeyash Technical Campus