City
Epaper

President cannot issue directions regarding ‘assignment of law and time limit’;

By Lokmat Times Desk | Updated: December 31, 2025 20:50 IST

Lokmat News NetworkChhatrapati Sambhajinagar:The Aurangabad bench of the Mumbai High Court, comprising justices Vibha Kankanwadi and Hiten ...

Open in App

Lokmat News Network

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar:

The Aurangabad bench of the Mumbai High Court, comprising justices Vibha Kankanwadi and Hiten Venegaonkar, has clarified that under Article 226 of the State Constitution, the President cannot be directed regarding giving consent or the timeline for the “Maharashtra Yoga and Naturopathy Act, 2016.”

However, considering the orders of the Department of Medical Education & Drugs and the AYUSH Directorate, and since the district medical officer withdrew the letter prohibiting the petitioner from practising naturopathy, the petitioner is not barred from practising naturopathy as a medical business. The bench also clarified that registration under the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961, is not required, and dismissed the petition.

What was the petition?

Laxmikant Bhanudas Waghmare, a naturopathy practitioner from Shirur Tajband in Latur, through advocate Vitthalrao Salagre, had filed a petition requesting that the Centre’s Ministry of AYUSH provide consent for the “Maharashtra Yoga and Naturopathy Act, 2016,” and also make provisions for registration of yoga and naturopathy practitioners for business purposes. The Centre’s counsel informed the court that the Act is still pending presidential consent. The bench clarified that the President cannot be directed under the relevant provisions of the State Constitution.

Ban on treatment

The petitioner had registered under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act. However, according to a circular dated 20 September 2005 by the Department of Medical Education & Drugs, practitioners in rural areas cannot provide treatment without registration. Earlier, registrations of rural practitioners had been cancelled. On this basis, the district medical officer had sought guidance from senior authorities and, until then, the petitioner was instructed on 25 October 2017 to stop providing naturopathy treatments. The matter was handled by Krishna Saluke on behalf of the Central Government and R. B. Dhaware on behalf of the State Government.

Open in App

Related Stories

TechnologyCisco Layoffs: US Tech Company to Cut Around 4,000 Employees

InternationalEAM Jaishankar holds series of key bilateral meetings on sidelines of BRICS meet

NationalEAM Jaishankar holds series of key bilateral meetings on sidelines of BRICS meet

Other SportsPSG crowned Ligue 1 champions for fifth time in a row

InternationalMQ-28 Ghost Bat makes appearance during India-Australia 12th Air Staff Talks on future aerospace collaboration

Aurangabad Realted Stories

Aurangabad200 Patients hit by heat in the district

AurangabadFoodgrain transport tender subject to final verdict

Aurangabad90 kg of plastic seized from Chhawani area; Rs 5,000 Fine Imposed

Aurangabad30 acres of Grazing land destroyed in Mahal Kinhola fire

AurangabadLal Govind Prabhu as 'Shri Ram Katha' Set to Begin in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar