City
Epaper

Samruddhi expressway contractor to pay a fine of Rs 328 crore

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: September 9, 2021 19:45 IST

Aurangabad, Sept 9:Justice Mangesh Patil on Wednesday dismissed three separate petitions filed by Samruddhi expressway contractor Ms Monte ...

Open in App

Aurangabad, Sept 9:

Justice Mangesh Patil on Wednesday dismissed three separate petitions filed by Samruddhi expressway contractor Ms Monte Carlo Ltd in the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court against the Rs 328 crore fine imposed by the Jalna Tehsildar for illegal extraction of minor minerals. The bench also rejected the company's request to uphold the interim stay granted by the bench in this regard till it files an appeal in the Supreme Court. As a result, the company will have to pay a penalty of Rs 328 crore.

The company has been awarded the contract for construction of Samruddhi expressway between Jalna and Aurangabad. The company was found to have illegally mined, used, transported and stored minor minerals. Former MLA of Badnapur Santosh Sambre had lodged a complaint with the district collector of Jalna alleging that a large amount of government revenue was lost due to illegal extraction. The district collector had set up a committee to investigate the matter. The committee found that the company had illegally extracted minor minerals in Jalna and Badnapur tehsils. Tehsildars had imposed a total fine of Rs 328 crore on the company in three phases. The bench had earlier granted interim stay on recovery of the fine.

Intervention application in court

Former MLA Sambre through adv Vishnu Madan Patil, adv Amarjeetsingh Girase and adv Lalit Mahajan had filed an intervention application in the court. He pointed out to the bench that the company should have filed an appeal with the district collector under section 247 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Act against the order of the Tehsildar. But the company has filed a petition in the high court without appealing to the district collector. Therefore, the petition should be rejected, he requested. At the end of the hearing, the bench passed the above order. Additional public prosecutor Siddharth Yavalkar represented the government.

Tags: Ms Monte Carlo LtdMangesh patilBombay High CourtJustice of bombay high courtBombay highJalna TehsildarSupreme CourtMLAMLA Sambre
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiMumbai Pollution: Bombay High Court Calls Clean Air a Fundamental Right, Slams BMC Over Kanjurmarg Stench

MaharashtraMaharashtra: Bombay High Court Suspends Sentence of NCP Leader Manikrao Kokate, Grants Bail in 1995 Cheating and Forgery Case

MumbaiBomb Threats Issued to Bombay High Court and Magistrate Courts in Andheri, Bandra and Esplanade; Search Underway

MumbaiMumbai: Man Attempts Self-Immolation Outside Bombay High Court, Suffers Severe Burns

MaharashtraBombay High Court Recruitment 2025: Notification for 2,381 Vacancies for Clerk, Driver, Peon and Steno; Application From December 15

Aurangabad Realted Stories

AurangabadBJP-Shinde Sena blames each other for delay in resolving seat sharing issue

Aurangabad2 create ruckus with swords & attempt to burn vehicles

AurangabadClerk demanded bribe to reduce professional tax from Rs 3 lakh to Rs 20,000

AurangabadTaps run dry as city water supply disrupted for 11 hours

AurangabadMan’s nose injured due to nylon manja