City
Epaper

Larger public purpose would stand defeated if violators are allowed to go scot-free just because of delay in initiating action: SEBI

By IANS | Updated: April 10, 2024 23:10 IST

New Delhi, April 10 Markets regulator SEBI has said in an order that the larger public purpose of ...

Open in App

New Delhi, April 10 Markets regulator SEBI has said in an order that the larger public purpose of investor protection would stand defeated if the violators are allowed to go scot-free just because of delay in initiating action against them.

The SEBI said this in an adjudication order where it imposed a penalty of Rs 2 lakh on Williamson Magor and Company Ltd (WMCL).

“It is to be noted that the SEBI Act, 1992, and the regulations framed thereunder, have got a larger public purpose in the form of investor protection and the regulation and development of the securities market. These purposes would stand defeated if the violators are allowed to go scot-free just because of a delay in initiating action against them," SEBI said.

“In view of the above facts, I find that no prejudice has been caused upon the noticee nor has it been able to clearly make out a case of prejudice due to the alleged delay in the initiation of proceedings," the order read.

It was alleged in the complaint that WMCL entered into a related party transaction with Babcock Borsig Ltd., its associate company, involving the sale of 1,13,360 shares (‘transaction’) of Woodlands Multispecialty Hospital Ltd, without corporate approvals and without making appropriate disclosures under the accounting standards.

In this regard, it was noted in the SCN that the noticee as per Clause 49 (VII) (D) of the erstwhile Equity Listing Agreement, prior approval of the audit committee was required for RPTs undertaken by the noticee from October 1, 2014, onwards.

However, the noticee in its reply to SEBI submitted that board approval was taken and approval of the audit committee was not required for the transaction, therefore, prior approval of the audit committee was not taken for the transaction with Babcock Borsig Ltd.

“In the present matter based on the findings of the examination, it has been established that the noticee has not complied with the requirements of the erstwhile Equity Listing Agreement. The noticee was under a statutory obligation to abide by the provisions of the erstwhile Equity Listing Agreement, which it failed to do in relation to the said related party transaction.

"The said violations by the noticee attract a monetary penalty. Therefore, I feel it appropriate to levy a penalty which is commensurate with the nature of the violation, which acts as a deterrent factor for the noticee and others in protecting the interest of the investor in the securities market," SEBI said.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentDhurandhar Box Office Collection Day 14: Ranveer Singh Film Crosses Rs 450 Crore Mark; Check Day-Wise Earnings

EntertainmentRaat Akeli Hai- The Bansal Murders Review: A Tense, Multi-Layered Mystery

Entertainment"Learnt so much from him as an actor": Anupam Kher meets Kamal Haasan at Delhi Airport

NationalMaoist area committee member with Rs 5 lakh bounty killed in Bijapur encounter

BusinessHCLTech to acquire telco solutions business from HPE to strengthen engineering, AI-led network propositions

Business Realted Stories

BusinessPune records 14,234 property registrations in Nov, stamp duty collections reach Rs 565 crore

BusinessIndian markets recorded worst relative performance in 30 years among emerging markets: Jefferies

BusinessGifts & Stationery India 2026 Set to Redefine the Industry in Hyderabad

BusinessParvinder Singh Gahlaut Discusses Role of Climate Smart Agriculture and AI in Transforming Indian Agriculture

BusinessShriram Finance inks pact with Japan's MUFG Bank for investment of Rs 39,618 crore; MUFG to acquire 20% stake