City
Epaper

Regulator slaps $183.7 million fine on 4 major S. Korean banks

By IANS | Updated: January 21, 2026 09:25 IST

Seoul, Jan 21 The antitrust regulator here said on Wednesday that it has imposed a combined fine of ...

Open in App

Seoul, Jan 21 The antitrust regulator here said on Wednesday that it has imposed a combined fine of 272 billion won ($183.7 million) on the country's four major commercial banks for allegedly colluding on real estate lending limits tied to loan-to-value (LTV) ratios.

The banks -- Shinhan Bank, Woori Bank, Hana Bank and KB Kookmin Bank -- are accused of exchanging internal documents related to LTV ratios and coordinating their lending limits, a practice that restricted competition in the mortgage loan market, according to the Fair Trade Commission (FTC), reports Yonhap news agency.

The LTV ratio is a key regulatory tool used to curb household debt by limiting how much borrowers can take out in loans based on the value of their property used as collateral.

"Between a minimum of 736 cases and a maximum of 7,500 cases, the four major banks repeatedly exchanged detailed information on their LTV ratios over a long period whenever necessary," said Lee Sun-mi, a senior FTC official.

The information sharing allowed the banks to reduce uncertainty about competitors' business strategies and avoid competition on LTV ratios, enabling them to generate stable operating profits, the FTC said.

Because the four major banks account for about 60 percent of the country's real estate mortgage loan market, the similarity in their LTV ratios limited consumers' ability to choose among lenders, the watchdog added.

The FTC said the alleged collusion had a particularly harmful impact on small and midsized enterprises and small business owners, as they typically have lower credit ratings, making it more difficult for them to raise funds through unsecured loans or to provide additional collateral.

As a result, such borrowers rely heavily on secured loans, meaning banks' decisions on LTV ratios have a significant influence on whether financing is available, the FTC aid.

The case marks the first application of a revised fair trade law that took effect on Dec. 30, 2021, which introduced a new provision banning anti-competitive collusion through the exchange of sensitive business information.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalIndia matters to world; we must be more careful, measured in our responses: Syed Akbaruddin

PoliticsHope opposition will also support Nari Shakti Adhiniyam: Union Minister Chirag Paswan

BusinessMistakes Travellers Make During IRCTC Ticket Booking and How to Avoid Them

Technology5 Best Video Watermark Removers in 2026: Which One Should You Use?

Other SportsInspire Institute of Sport hosts National Kabaddi Strength, Conditioning Camp in collaboration with AKFI, Mashal Sports

Business Realted Stories

BusinessRupee depreciation post Feb 27 in line with other currencies: Report

BusinessIndia’s First Global Cake Awards, IICMA 2026, Returns to New Delhi, Strengthening India’s Global Presence in Cake Artistry

BusinessNational Award for Dr. Paresh Makwana Puts Ahmedabad on India's Fertility Excellence Map

BusinessGovt moves to boost Induction Heater production amid West Asia tensions

BusinessSentiment on Indian IT sector turns bearish amid global uncertainties: Report