City
Epaper

Bombay HC hears Aditya Pancholi's plea to quash 2019 rape FIR, issues notice to complainant

By ANI | Updated: February 12, 2026 17:00 IST

Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], February 12 : The Bombay High Court, on Thursday, heard a petition filed by Bollywood actor ...

Open in App

Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], February 12 : The Bombay High Court, on Thursday, heard a petition filed by Bollywood actor Aditya Pancholi, seeking to quash a rape FIR (including IPC 376 and other sections) filed against him in 2019 at Mumbai's Versova police station.

Appearing for the actor, advocate Prashant Patil reiterated the plea to be set aside. While Pancholi has been named as an accused in the matter, the complainant is a female Bollywood actress.

Advocate Prashant Patil revealed that the public prosecutor, appearing for the police, stated that despite 11 notices sent by the police, the victim did not appear for the investigation. Following the same, the Bombay HC has issued a fresh notice on Thursday, directing her to appear on the next date, scheduled for February 24.

The FIR registered against Aditya Pancholi on June 27, 2019, continues to stir controversy. The accused claimed that the complaint has been filed nearly 15 years after the alleged incident, describing it as "malicious."

Citing the Supreme Court's 'Bhajanlal' judgement, the petition further sought quashing of the FIR.

Prashant Patil shared that an individual met Aditya Pancholi before the incident, a recording of which remains with them. The recording has been presented in the court, explaining the wrongful intention behind registering it again.

The case currently remains pending the court, with the next hearing set for February 24, 2026.

In 2019, the Mumbai Police filed an FIR under charges of alleged rape against Pancholi on the complaint of a Bollywood actress.

In the complaint filed at Versova Police Station, Pancholi was charged under Sections 376 (rape), 328 (causing hurt by means of poison), 384 (extortion), 341 (wrongful restraint), 342 (wrongful confinement), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Soon after the FIR was filed, the actor asserted about being "falsely implicated in this case."

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

PunePune Crime: Reckless Drunk Driver Goes on Rampage, Caught After Police Action (Video)

BusinessPM Mudra Yojana boosts self-employment in Giridih, empowers women entrepreneurs

BusinessPMMY empowers entrepreneurs in Karnataka, creates jobs and boosts self-reliance

NationalPM Mudra Yojana boosts self-employment in Giridih, empowers women entrepreneurs

NationalPMMY empowers entrepreneurs in Karnataka, creates jobs and boosts self-reliance

Entertainment Realted Stories

EntertainmentSamay Raina Shares Surprise Fan Encounter at Police Station during India’s Got Latent Row (Watch Video)

Entertainment"Life can turn into hell...": Rajinikanth urges youth to focus on education, not drugs or alcohol

EntertainmentAllu Arjun Drops ‘RAAKA’ First Look on Birthday; Bold Avatar Trends Online

EntertainmentSaqib Saleem on playing SSP Samardeep in ‘Kaptaan’: He does not try to be a hero

EntertainmentSharad Malhotra on ‘ACP Vikrant’: This is like homecoming for me