City
Epaper

M. Night Shyamalan faces $81 million copyright trial over OTT show ‘Servant’

By IANS | Updated: January 15, 2025 13:10 IST

Los Angeles, Jan 15 Filmmaker M. Night Shyamalan is facing a trial over allegations that he copied from ...

Open in App

Los Angeles, Jan 15 Filmmaker M. Night Shyamalan is facing a trial over allegations that he copied from an independent film to make the streaming show ‘Servant’.

The show streams on Apple TV+. Francesca Gregorini, an Italy born director, is suing Shyamalan and Apple for $81 million, alleging that the show stole key elements from her 2013 movie, ‘The Truth About Emanuel’, reports ‘Variety’.

Her attorney, Patrick Arenz, showed jurors clips of both projects during his opening statement on Tuesday in federal court in Riverside, California.

As per ‘Variety’, he argued that both depict a delusional mother who cares for a doll as though it is a real baby, and a nanny who is complicit in the delusion.

“This is a simple case”, Arenz told the jury. “There would be no ‘Servant’ without ‘Emanuel’”.

M. Night Shyamalan sat behind the defense attorneys, alongside producer Taylor Latham and Matt Cherniss, the head of programming at Apple TV+. Tony Basgallop, the British writer who created the series, sat at the defense counsel table, while Gregorini sat with her lawyers at the plaintiffs’ table.

When it was the defense’s turn, attorney Brittany Amadi argued that Basgallop began developing the show years before ‘The Truth About Emanuel’ was released, and that those involved with the show never drew on the film.

“Ms. Gregorini is seeking a windfall here”, Amadi said. “She’s seeking $81 million for work she didn’t do. The truth is the creators of ‘Servant’ do not owe anything to Ms. Gregorini”. Gregorini sued in January 2020, shortly after ‘Servant’, debuted on the platform.

A federal judge initially threw out the case a few months later, but the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals revived it in 2022, finding a genuine dispute over whether the two works are “substantially similar”.

Judge Sunshine Sykes denied Apple’s motion for summary judgment in November, ordering that the suit would have to be settled by a jury.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

CricketJust hasn't read the room: Simon Doull shocked by Ashwin's surprise decision to pull out of ILT20 auction

NationalCentral employees in Rajasthan, MP express happiness over 3 pc DA hike ahead of Diwali

BusinessRevenue Department to probe Wintrack allegations against Chennai Customs, Govt says committed to ease of business

TechnologyAPEDA showcases India’s agri-food strengths as export partner at World Food India

BusinessAPEDA showcases India’s agri-food strengths as export partner at World Food India

Entertainment Realted Stories

EntertainmentNysa Devgn joins her mother Kajol in carrying forward the legacy of 'Sindur Khela'

EntertainmentBipasha Basu flaunts festive look with her viral song “Bipasha Bipasha”

EntertainmentNicolas Cage starrer 'The Carpenter's Son' trailer out

EntertainmentArjun Rampal on 100 years of RSS: Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh symbolizes patriotism and selfless service

EntertainmentSunny Sanskari Ki Tulsi Kumari: Netizens Call Varun Dhawan, Janhvi Kapoor's Rom-com A Family Entertainer, Check X Reviews