City
Epaper

Rape accuser files motion to dismiss Jay-Z’s defamation lawsuit against her

By IANS | Updated: April 23, 2025 16:52 IST

Los Angeles, April 23 The accuser, who levelled allegations sexual assault against rapper Shawn ‘Jay-Z’ Carter, has now ...

Open in App

Los Angeles, April 23 The accuser, who levelled allegations sexual assault against rapper Shawn ‘Jay-Z’ Carter, has now asked a judge to dismiss the rapper's lawsuit against her.

The woman, identified in court documents as Jane Doe, alleged in a December 2024 complaint that Jay-Z and Sean "Diddy" Combs raped her at an MTV Video Music Awards afterparty when she was 13 years old, reports ‘People’ magazine.

Though her attorneys voluntarily dismissed the case in February, Jay-Z filed his own lawsuit against Doe and her legal team, Tony Buzbee and David Fortney, a month later. He sued Doe and her lawyers, alleging malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and civil conspiracy.

As per ‘People’, he also sued Doe separately, alleging defamation. He claimed in his complaint that the initial allegations of rape against him were knowingly “false” and “malicious”, and Doe's lawsuit was “strategically and tactically calculated" in an attempt to extort him.

On Tuesday (Pacific Standard Time), Doe filed a motion to dismiss Jay-Z's lawsuit, alleging that he "fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted”.

Her attorneys argued in the motion that Jay-Z's malicious prosecution claim fails short since he alleges "the lawsuit was initiated and prosecuted for malicious reasons, not that any process was wrongfully used after issuance”.

"Carter has not alleged facts that would support an abuse of process claim”, the motion states. The filing says the civil conspiracy claim against the accuser should also be dismissed as her lawyers "have shown that, as attorneys, they are not liable for civil conspiracy under these allegations”.

"Since a conspiracy requires more than one party, Doe cannot be liable for civil conspiracy”, the motion continues.

Doe requests that the defamation claim against her be dismissed, stating that the allegations in her complaint and comments to the media are "absolutely privileged" under California law "and cannot form the basis for a defamation claim”.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalVande Bharat trains drive demand for new era of Modern Rail Travel

International"Goodwill but no trust": Iranian delegates in Islamabad for peace talks with US

InternationalGround Control to Major Tom: Artemis II crew splashes down after historic Moon mission

NationalBJP MLA Ashok Dinda's associate detained with cash, gold in West Bengal

Other SportsKarate athlete Harsha Sahu welcomes Women's Reservation Bill, thanks PM Modi

Entertainment Realted Stories

EntertainmentFolk singer Mame Khan shares pics with Ranveer Singh, Aryan Khan from Anant Ambani's birthday celebrations

EntertainmentDhurandhar 2 Box Office Collection Day 23: Ranveer Singh’s Film Crosses Rs 1,055 Crore in India; Check Day-Wise Earnings Report

EntertainmentKunal Kapoor shares pics from recent trek amidst calm and serene nature

EntertainmentTu Yaa Main OTT Release: When And Where To Watch Shanaya Kapoor and Adarsh Gourav’s Suspense Thriller Film Online

EntertainmentLabrinth not part of 'Euphoria' season 3 music, Hans Zimmer takes over