City
Epaper

SC proceeds with contempt cases against Kunal Kamra, Rachita Taneja

By IANS | Updated: December 18, 2020 12:35 IST

New Delhi, Dec 18 The Supreme Court on Friday decided to proceed with the criminal contempt of court ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Dec 18 The Supreme Court on Friday decided to proceed with the criminal contempt of court cases against stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra and cartoonist Rachita Taneja for posting scandalous tweets and cartoons against the top court.

Earlier, the Attorney general K.K. Venugopal had already given consent for filing of contempt pleas against Kamra and Taneja.

A bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan and comprising Justices R. Subhash Reddy and M.R. Shah issued notice to both Kamra and Taneja.

However, the top court dispensed them from personal appearance.

The plea has been filed by law students Shrirang Katneshwarkar, Nitika Duhan, and advocates Amey Abhay Sirsikar, Abhishek Sharan Raskar, and Sattyendra Vinayak Muley.

"The alleged contemnor (Kamra) has the following of 1.7 million people. The scandalous tweets of the alleged contemnor were seen by his followers and many of them retweeted the same," said the plea.

Citing Section 2 (c) (i) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioners argued that this section is explicit and the tweets published by Kamra clearly showed he allegedly committed gross contempt of the apex court.

The plea emphasized that every follower of Kamra on Twitter must have read the tweets and more than one thousand people have retweeted the scandalous tweets.

The petitioners insisted that Kamra was fully aware of his action. "When some persons tried to make the alleged contemnor aware about the contempt of this court, the alleged contemnor was rude, arrogant and unapologetic. The conduct of the alleged contemnor shows that he has no regard for this court," said the plea.

The plea contended that the AG by reproducing the tweets observed that the tweets are not only in bad taste but clearly cross the line between humour and contempt of the court.

The petitioners said though the Supreme Court has let off contemnors in the past upon tendering apology, but this case is different.

"The conduct of the alleged contemnor is so harsh that the alleged contemnor does not deserve any sympathy at the hands of this court even in case of tendering apology.

"Citizens of this country strongly believe that the people like the alleged contemnor should not be spared at any cost," said the plea seeking action against Kamra.

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

International"We want to know the truth, we want transparency": US lawyer on AI 171 crash

InternationalPutting the puzzle together: Attorney Mike Andrews on AI171 crash

Entertainment"Ye unka badappan hai vo mere paas aaye": Annu Kapoor on meeting former Army chief Gen Bikram Singh

InternationalTurkey hit by 6.1 magnitude earthquake, multiple aftershocks recorded

EntertainmentCIFF closes with grand celebration; Delhi CM says "Want to do everything to reawaken the city's historical glory"

Entertainment Realted Stories

EntertainmentPap Diaries: Ananya Panday, Suhana Khan spend Sunday together, little AbRam joins the girls

EntertainmentDad-to-be Pete Davidson shares the first movie he wants his baby to see

EntertainmentHrithik Roshan Is All Praises for NTR: “Tarak, I Have Not Just Observed You, But I Have Learnt From You

EntertainmentSebastian Stan to star in Radu Jude's project, see details

EntertainmentKourtney Kardashian reacts to backlash over not putting 21-month-old son in life vest