City
Epaper

Johnson & Johnson asked to pay $18.8 million to man who got cancer from baby powder

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: July 19, 2023 15:05 IST

Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay $18.8 million to a California man who blamed the company’s talcum-based powders ...

Open in App

Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay $18.8 million to a California man who blamed the company’s talcum-based powders for giving him cancer in the company’s first trial in almost two years over accusations it hid the health risks of its iconic baby powder. The jury ruled in favor of Emory Hernandez Valadez, who filed suit last year in California state court in Oakland against J&J, seeking monetary damages. Hernandez, 24, has said he developed mesothelioma, a deadly cancer, in the tissue around his heart as a result of heavy exposure to the company's talc since childhood. The six-week trial was the first over talc that New Brunswick, New Jersey-based J&J has faced in almost two years.

The jury found that Hernandez was entitled to damages to compensate him for his medical bills and pain and suffering, but declined to award punitive damages against the company. Hernandez will not be able to collect the judgment in the foreseeable future, thanks to a bankruptcy court order freezing most litigation over J&J's talc. J&J vice president of litigation Erik Haas said in a statement that the company would appeal the verdict, calling it "irreconcilable with the decades of independent scientific evaluations confirming Johnson's Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer."

A lawyer for Hernandez could not immediately be reached for comment. In closing arguments to the jury on July 10, J&J's lawyers said there was no evidence either linking Hernandez's kind of mesolthelioma to asbestos or proving that Hernandez was ever exposed to tainted talc. Hernandez's lawyers during closing arguments accused J&J of a "despicable" decades-long coverup of asbestos contamination.Hernandez testified in June, telling jurors that he would have avoided J&J's talc if he had been warned that it contained asbestos, as his lawsuit alleges. Jurors heard from Hernandez's mother, Anna Camacho, who said she used large amounts of J&J's baby powder on her son when he was a baby and through childhood. She cried as she described Hernandez's illness. 

Tags: Johnson & JohnsonJohnson & johnson consumer health
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiMumbai Metro 4 Slab Collapse: One Dead, 3 Injured As Part of Under-Construction Pillar Collapses in Mulund West

MumbaiMumbai Metro Line 4 Slab Collapse: Was MMRDA Warned About the Pillar Crack?

MumbaiMumbai Metro Pillar Collapse: Several Injured After Partially Built Metro Pillar Collapses in Mulund (Watch Video)

HealthEli Lilly's drug to lead obesity, diabetes treatment: Report

HealthJohnson and Johnson offers 8.9 billion dollar settlement of talcum cancer claims

Health Realted Stories

Health2,527 eateries inspected, 703 kg of food destroyed as Gujarat steps up paneer–analogue checks

HealthJayant Patil urges Maha govt to scrap DPT vaccine strain sale​

HealthHealth Tips: How to Increase Hemoglobin Levels With Simple Food Pairings

HealthAssam Rifles seizes smuggled haul of rare medicinal plant in Mizoram, apprehends three

HealthPakistan's current response to TB insufficient as cases continue to rise: Report