City
Epaper

Johnson & Johnson asked to pay $18.8 million to man who got cancer from baby powder

By Lokmat English Desk | Published: July 19, 2023 3:03 PM

Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay $18.8 million to a California man who blamed the company’s talcum-based powders ...

Open in App

Johnson & Johnson was ordered to pay $18.8 million to a California man who blamed the company’s talcum-based powders for giving him cancer in the company’s first trial in almost two years over accusations it hid the health risks of its iconic baby powder. The jury ruled in favor of Emory Hernandez Valadez, who filed suit last year in California state court in Oakland against J&J, seeking monetary damages. Hernandez, 24, has said he developed mesothelioma, a deadly cancer, in the tissue around his heart as a result of heavy exposure to the company's talc since childhood. The six-week trial was the first over talc that New Brunswick, New Jersey-based J&J has faced in almost two years.

The jury found that Hernandez was entitled to damages to compensate him for his medical bills and pain and suffering, but declined to award punitive damages against the company. Hernandez will not be able to collect the judgment in the foreseeable future, thanks to a bankruptcy court order freezing most litigation over J&J's talc. J&J vice president of litigation Erik Haas said in a statement that the company would appeal the verdict, calling it "irreconcilable with the decades of independent scientific evaluations confirming Johnson's Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer."

A lawyer for Hernandez could not immediately be reached for comment. In closing arguments to the jury on July 10, J&J's lawyers said there was no evidence either linking Hernandez's kind of mesolthelioma to asbestos or proving that Hernandez was ever exposed to tainted talc. Hernandez's lawyers during closing arguments accused J&J of a "despicable" decades-long coverup of asbestos contamination.Hernandez testified in June, telling jurors that he would have avoided J&J's talc if he had been warned that it contained asbestos, as his lawsuit alleges. Jurors heard from Hernandez's mother, Anna Camacho, who said she used large amounts of J&J's baby powder on her son when he was a baby and through childhood. She cried as she described Hernandez's illness. 

Tags: Johnson & JohnsonJohnson & johnson consumer health
Open in App

Related Stories

HealthEli Lilly's drug to lead obesity, diabetes treatment: Report

HealthJohnson and Johnson offers 8.9 billion dollar settlement of talcum cancer claims

BusinessJohnson & Johnson offers USD 8.9 bln to settle 'talc caused cancer' lawsuits

NationalI had major side effects from 2nd Covid booster shot: Elon Musk

MaharashtraBombay HC permits Johnson & Johnson to manufacture and sell its baby powder

Health Realted Stories

HealthTelangana's drugs controller suspends license of six wholesalers

HealthDelhi hospital fire tragedy: Owner, co-accused sent to 3-day police custody

HealthIMD forecasts heat wave across most of India in June

HealthUPI helped India fight Covid-19 pandemic better than the world: PM Modi

HealthIndia urgently needs stem cell donors to fight blood disorders, say experts