City
Epaper

SC issues notice on plea contending 'abortion of foetus violates right to life'

By IANS | Updated: September 2, 2022 00:00 IST

New Delhi, Sep 1 The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Central government on a plea challenging ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Sep 1 The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Central government on a plea challenging provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, as as allowing abortion of foetus, due to various reasons, violated right to life of the yet-to-be-born.

A bench of Justices B.R. Gavai and C.T. Ravi Kumar sought reply from the Central government on a petition filed by 'Cry for Life Society' and others.

Petitioners challenged the validity of the Kerala High Court's order of June 9, 2020 which declined to entertain their plea. In the apex court, the petitioners contended that their plea raises substantial questions of law in relation to the provisions of Section 3 of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

The petitioners, led by senior advocate K. Radhakrishnan and advocate John Mathew, contended that abortion would violate the right to life and the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the yet to be born is violated by the said provisions of the MTP Act.

"This court in Suchita Srivastava and Anr v/s Chandigarh Administration, reported in (2009) 9 SCC 1, though while dealing with the right of a woman to make reproductive choices, did specifically recognise the compelling state interest in protecting the life of the prospective child in case of a pregnant woman," said the plea.

The plea contended that once the child is formed, it acquires all rights of a human being and is entitled to all protection afforded to every citizen of India, including right to life and property, the only exception is when it becomes a risk or threat to the life of the mother.

The plea added, "the High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ petition concluding that the validity of Section-3 (2) was upheld by this court in its letter and spirit in the decisions of this court and relied on by the High Court in the impugned judgment, when the validity and the vires were not actually under challenge in those cases before this court.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: SeptemberJohn mathewindiaNew DelhiSupreme CourtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westIndiUk-indiaRepublic of indiaIndia india
Open in App

Related Stories

ThaneBadlapur School Sexual Assault Case: FIR Still Pending as HC Deadline Passes

MaharashtraUPSC Cheating Case: Pooja Khedkar Denies Allegations of Exam Fraud, Name Change and Fake Disability Certificate

NationalSupreme Court Dismisses PIL on Pahalgam Terror Attack Investigation

EntertainmentAjith Kumar Injured in Fan Frenzy After Padma Bhushan Award Ceremony, Actor Hospitalized In Chennai

MumbaiMumbai: Gold Sales Cross ₹12,000 Crores Nationwide on Akshaya Tritiya; Mumbai MMR Sees ₹800 Crores Trade

Health Realted Stories

HealthIn Gujarat’s Sabarkantha, 36,000 people benefit from Ayushman Yojana in past one year

HealthHand hygiene not a luxury but cornerstone of safe healthcare: WHO

HealthHuman antibodies neutralise neurotoxins of 19 of world’s deadliest snakes

HealthScientists create hair-like electrode to monitor brain’s electrical activity

HealthSC to hear on Monday plea against two shifts in NEET PG 2025