City
Epaper

SC stays Madras HC order quashing ban on gutka, tobacco products in TN

By IANS | Updated: April 25, 2023 22:35 IST

New Delhi, April 25 The Supreme Court on Tuesday stayed a Madras High Court order, which quashed a ...

Open in App

New Delhi, April 25 The Supreme Court on Tuesday stayed a Madras High Court order, which quashed a May 2018 notification prohibiting sale, manufacture, and transport of gutkha, and other tobacco-based products in Tamil Nadu.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal and Additional Advocate General Amit Anand Tiwari, representing the Tamil Nadu government, submitted before a bench headed by Justice K.M. Joseph that health is a state subject and cited a top court directive justifying the ban imposed on sale, manufacture and transport of gutkha, and other tobacco-based products.

Sibal argued that the state exchequer is burdened by health issues, which arise as a consequence of chewing of tobacco and the government has every right to take care of the health of its citizens.

The state government had contended that orders of the Food Safety Commissioner banning sale, storage, manufacture of gutkha and other tobacco products are backed by Regulation 2.3.4 of the Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition and Restriction on Sales) Regulations, 2011.

The bench, also comprising Justice B.V. Nagarathna, stayed the high court order passed on January 20, saying that the state government has made out a case to stay the impugned judgment.

The top court allowed the manufacturers to approach the appropriate forum.

In March, the top court had sought a reply on a plea filed by Tamil Nadu government challenging an order of the Madras High Court quashing the May 2018 notification.

The top court sought response from the food safety commissioner, Jayavilas Tobacco Traders and others.

The state government, in its appeal, contended that the high court erroneously held that notifications banning gutkha and pan masala in the state issued by the Food Safety Commissioner under Regulation 2.3.4 of the 2011 regulations are not within his powers.

The high court had observed that the Food Safety Commissioner, by issuing successive notifications imposing a permanent ban on tobacco products, would amount to conferring a power that was not provided in the law.


ss/vd

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Madras High CourtKapil SibalSupreme CourtHigh court and supreme courtLondon high courtThe madras high courtThe london high courtChennai high courtUnited kingdom high courtChief justice of bombay high court
Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentHAQ’ Promotions Begin: Emraan Hashmi, Yami Gautam Dhar Recreate Film Poster at Supreme Court

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Crashes Over 10% After Superme Court’s Written Order on AGR Dues Sparks Confuson

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Price Fall 3% After SC AGR Relief; Experts Call It a Risky Buy

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Jumps 9%, Touches ₹10 After Supreme Court Grants Relief in AGR Dues

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Price Gains Ahead of Supreme Court Hearing in AGR Dues Case

Health Realted Stories

HealthK'taka Guv Thawarchand Gehlot hospitalised; CM Siddaramiah wishes him speedy recovery

HealthFitness Tips: Why Women Gain Belly Fat and How to Reduce It Naturally

HealthRising infections from lesser-known bacterium, says PGI Chandigarh

HealthKerala: Medical college doctors threaten indefinite strike over govt apathy

Health129 more test positive for dengue in Manipur, case tally rises to 3,594 this year