City
Epaper

Why patients worry more after seeing incomprehensible medical test results

By IANS | Updated: January 5, 2025 13:05 IST

New York, Jan 5 Medical reports worldwide are not written with patients in mind, which increases their overall ...

Open in App

New York, Jan 5 Medical reports worldwide are not written with patients in mind, which increases their overall level of worry as they find test results hard to understand, according to researchers.

For example, a standard pathology report is written by a pathologist for a clinical specialist like a surgeon or a cancer doctor or for other pathologists to read, said Cathryn Lapedis, of the Department of Pathology at University of Michigan Health in the US.

In a study published in the journal JAMA, Lapedis and her colleagues tested whether people could understand standard pathology reports and whether a patient-centred report might improve patient understanding.

A patient-centred pathology report gives important information on the patient’s diagnosis in a clear format that minimises medical terminology, she said.

For example, a standard pathology report will include a term like prostatic adenocarcinoma, but the patient-centred report will simply call it prostate cancer.

The team recruited 2,238 adults, aged 55 to 84, who had a prostate but no history of prostate cancer. Participants were provided with a hypothetical scenario in which they were seeking care due to troubling urinary symptoms, received a biopsy and then would receive results from that test through their patient portal.

They were also asked to report their level of worry based on the results.

“We found that most people cannot get basic information — like whether or not they have prostate cancer from standard pathology reports. For example, in our participants reviewing the standard University report, only 39 per cent could accurately identify that the report showed cancer,” said Lapedis.

However, 93 per cent of those who received the patient-centred pathology report accurately identified that the report showed prostate cancer.

Participants’ level of worry was more closely associated with their risk level.

The study authors recommend that hospital systems consider including patient-centred pathology reports with standard reports to improve patient understanding.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalPakistan's duplicity on Palestine, Taliban breeds a new TTP-like headache in Bangladesh

BusinessColgate-Palmolive India's Q2 profit falls 17 pc, revenue slips over 6 pc

NationalThree arrested for attack on Gau Rakshak Dal activist in Hyderabad

NationalPakistan's duplicity on Palestine, Taliban breeds a new TTP-like headache in Bangladesh

BusinessPVL 2025: Ahmedabad Defenders hand Mumbai Meteors their first defeat of the season

Health Realted Stories

HealthMP: Over 125 injured by carbide guns; many face permanent blindness

HealthCDSCO flags 112 drug samples as ‘not of standard quality’ in September

HealthUS reports record measles cases since 1992

HealthSeason's 1st bird flu outbreak in Japan confirmed in Hokkaido

HealthGovt launches training modules for effective management of chemical emergencies