City
Epaper

Allahabad HC sets aside dismissal on ground of live-in relationship

By IANS | Updated: July 20, 2021 10:40 IST

Prayagraj (UP), July 20 The Allahabad high court has set aside the dismissal order of a government employee ...

Open in App

Prayagraj (UP), July 20 The Allahabad high court has set aside the dismissal order of a government employee who was removed from service for being in a live-in relationship with another woman.

The man is married and his wife is alive.

Justice Pankaj Bhatia, while passing the order, made it clear to the state authorities to pass a fresh order imposing minor penalties.

The order of dismissal was passed against the petitioner, Gore Lal Verma, solely on the ground that despite being married to one Laxmi Devi, who is alive, the petitioner maintained an extra-marital relationship with another lady named Hemlata Verma and both are staying together as husband and wife. He also has three children from the live-in relationship.

The authorities had recorded that the said conduct is against the provisions of the UP Government Servant Conduct Rules, 1956, and against the provisions of Hindu Marriage Act. As such, the order of dismissal from service was passed.

It was argued on behalf of the petitioner that in a similar matter in case of one Aneeta Yadav, this court, after considering, set aside the dismissal order.

However, an opportunity was granted to the respondents to award any minor penalty, if they so desire.

It was further argued that the said judgment was challenged in special leave to appeal and the Supreme Court refused to interfere. Consequently, the said special leave to appeal was dismissed.

After hearing the counsel, the court set aside his order of dismissal observing that considering the fact as well as the judgment of this court in the case of Aneeta Yadav, the petitioner is also entitled to the same benefit.

Consequently, the writ petition was allowed and the respondent authority was directed to reinstate the petitioner.

However, the court directed that the petitioner shall not be paid back wages from the date of dismissal till date.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Pankaj BhatiaGore lal vermaSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

NationalCryptocurrency Needs To Be Regulated, Banning Not an Option, Says Supreme Court

MaharashtraPune Porsche Crash: One Year On, 9 Accused Still Behind Bars; Justice Still in Motion

MaharashtraSupreme Court Clears Way for Local Body Elections in Maharashtra, Retains Pre-2022 OBC Quota

International Realted Stories

InternationalTaiwan slams China-Central Asia Summit statement, rejects Beijing's claim of sovereignty

International"Iran launched over 450 ballistic missiles and hundreds of UAVs in last 6 days," Israel Defence Spox says

InternationalUK to Ban Porn Featuring 'Choking' and 'Strangulation' Acts

International20 South Korean families evacuate Iran amid escalating Israel-Iran conflict

InternationalBangladesh NSA in Washington to brief US about progress on holding elections