City
Epaper

Congress hails US apex court verdict against Trump’s sweeping tariff strategy

By IANS | Updated: February 20, 2026 22:25 IST

New Delhi, Feb 20 Senior Congress leader and former Union minister Jairam Ramesh has hailed the US Supreme ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 20 Senior Congress leader and former Union minister Jairam Ramesh has hailed the US Supreme Court’s landmark ruling that struck down most of the sweeping tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump.

In a post on his X handle, Ramesh wrote, “Hats off to the US Supreme Court for striking down President Trump’s entire tariff strategy! Quite an amazing decision given its ideological composition. A 6-3 verdict is decisive.”

The ruling delivered on Friday marks a major setback to Trump’s economic agenda.

The conservative-led court, in a rare move, curtailed the President’s use of executive power, declaring that he lacked authority under a 1977 emergency law to impose broad import levies on America’s trading partners, including India.

Politico described the 6-3 decision as “a major repudiation of a core piece of Trump’s economic programme.”

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, underscored the constitutional limits of presidential authority. “The President asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope. In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorisation to exercise it,” Roberts stated.

He added that the 1977 law Trump relied upon “falls short” of the required congressional approval.

According to the US media, the justices ruled the President did not have the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose such sweeping tariffs.

The Hill further observed that the court “cast aside the bulk of President Trump’s sweeping tariffs Friday, obliterating a canon of his economic strategy in ruling that his use of an emergency statute to remake global trade was unlawful.”

The justices rejected Trump’s expanded interpretation of IEEPA, which allows Presidents to regulate imports in response to national emergencies posing “unusual and extraordinary” threats.

Roberts clarified: “We claim no special competence in matters of economics or foreign affairs. We claim only, as we must, the limited role assigned to us by Article III of the Constitution. Fulfilling that role, we hold that IEEPA does not authorise the President to impose tariffs.”

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalUS-Iran war, last year's Gen-Z unrest to affect Nepal's economy significantly

TechnologyGovt relaxes inspection norms for rice exports to Europe

TechnologyIndia, Qatar review strategic ties across trade, energy; agree to deepen bilateral cooperation

Other SportsIPL 2026: Some of Choudhary's shots reminded me of watching Dhoni, feels du Plessis

EntertainmentRiddhima Kapoor drops throwback pic with brother Ranbir & dadaji Raj Kapoor on Sibling Day

International Realted Stories

InternationalPranay Verma appointed as the next Ambassador of India to Belgium, EU

InternationalJeffrey Epstein Introduced Melania to Donald Trump, First Lady Denies Claim

InternationalPakistan: Students protest exam centre shift, alleged misconduct; shop demolitions spark backlash

InternationalRussia, Brazil launch global rollout of 'The Art of Sport' documentary series

InternationalJapan downgrades description of China in diplomatic report, drops 'most important' tag