City
Epaper

Defence pact with Turkey and Pakistan could mean Saudi Arabia shouldering new obligations, extra risks: Report

By IANS | Updated: January 22, 2026 21:10 IST

Riyadh, Jan 22 A defence pact with Turkey and Pakistan could mean Saudi Arabia shouldering new obligations and ...

Open in App

Riyadh, Jan 22 A defence pact with Turkey and Pakistan could mean Saudi Arabia shouldering new obligations and taking on extra risks it didn’t have before, a report has highlighted.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is reportedly exploring an extensive defence pact with Turkey and Pakistan, building on the Saudi-Pakistani mutual defence agreement (SDMA) signed in September 2025, Shay Gal, a strategic analyst specialising in international security, foreign policy, and geopolitical crisis management, wrote in the Eurasian Times.

"Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 can’t be outsourced. The entire plan depends on one thing that cannot be delegated: predictability," wrote Gal.

"However, a defence pact with Turkey and Pakistan, which could involve their own crisis and conflicts, does the opposite. It brings uncertainty and risk, which markets dislike. For markets, a treaty is not an umbrella. It is a contingent liability," he added.

The trilateral agreement would move Saudi Arabia's security centre of gravity away from the Gulf and put it into the volatile hands of non-Gulf powers.

"Ankara and Islamabad walk away with real leverage and a lot more room to maneuver. Riyadh, on the other hand, ends up shouldering new obligations and taking on extra risks it didn’t have before," the piece mentioned.

The Eurasian Times article detailed that if Riyadh weakens a Gulf-built platform while elevating Turkey within its security architecture, investors will treat Turkey’s routes as the safer bet. Saudi Arabia then loses twice: it slows the corridor meant to make the Kingdom a hub, while accelerating the one designed to make Turkey indispensable.

"A defence pact with Turkey and Pakistan would re-price Saudi Arabia as a risk rather than a security. It would bind the Kingdom to obligations it does not control, while others monetise permanence without surrendering autonomy," the author stated.

The writer mentioned that once security is formalised, routine support would become an expectation.

"Rollovers, deposit extensions, and deferred oil facilities grow harder to refuse, not through coercion, but through reputation. Saudi credibility becomes tied to Pakistan’s capacity. Pakistan’s capacity becomes tied to Saudi liquidity.

Turkey's upside is equally clear. A formal security role in the Gulf would give Ankara real legitimacy in the region, a much larger market for its booming defence industry, and direct access to Gulf militaries," it mentioned.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalCountdown for new year starts in Nepal with commencement of week-long Biska Jatra

Cricket"Team feels emotional after a close loss": DC bowler T Natarajan after 1-run loss to GT

EntertainmentSalman Khan keeps it casual in black as he lands in Mumbai after attending Anant Ambani's birthday bash

Entertainment"Film associations must raise their voice against this": Rajinikanth on alleged leaks of Jana Nayagan

PoliticsHyderabad Police launch 'She Netra' teams to curb hidden camera threats, boost women's safety

International Realted Stories

International"Demonstrated to some countries how to work with interceptors": Zelenskyy on deepening its defence cooperation in Middle East

InternationalAustralia acts against anti-Semitic hate preachers — Will others follow suit?

InternationalMinority group condemns custodial killing of Christian man in Pakistan

InternationalPakistan’s role in Iran-US ceasefire symbolic, not substantive: Report

InternationalBangladesh to hold election for 50 reserved women's seats in parliament on May 12