City
Epaper

Delhi HC restrains electric company from using 'KEI' trademark

By IANS | Updated: May 18, 2022 13:35 IST

New Delhi, May 18 The Delhi High Court has restrained an electrical company from infringing the trademark logo ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 18 The Delhi High Court has restrained an electrical company from infringing the trademark logo of KEI industries.

"I have found there to be a prima facie case of infringement, by the defendants, of the plaintiff's registered trademarks," Justice C. Hari Shankar said in an order dated May 17.

In the plea, KEI Industries Ltd, the plaintiff, alleged infringement by the defendant Kwality Electrico (India), of its registered trademark "KEI", of which it has registration both as a word mark and as the device mark.

The plaint was seeking a decree of permanent injunction, restraining the defendants from infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks either physically or via online platforms, along with other prayers for a rendition of accounts, delivery up, and declaration.

During the hearing, it was noted that the plaintiff holds a valid and subsisting word mark registration for the word 'KEI', in respect of electric wires and cables. Any use, by any other party, of the acronym 'KEI', in respect of identical or similar goods, would amount to infringement.

In the order, Justice Hari Shankar stated: "I am of the opinion that the plaintiff has succeeded in making out a prima facie case for an interlocutory injunction, restraining the defendants, or their agents, sister concerns, or any entity incorporated by the Defendants or anyone acting for and on their behalf as the case may be, from using the impugned mark, in relation to any electrical goods or instruments, including electrical fans, room coolers, geysers, electric heating apparatus, etc., or any allied or similar goods, pending disposal of the present suit."

The judge also observed: "I do not deem it necessary to burden this judgement with a discussion of all the judgements cited at the Bar, many of which are, in any event, merely interlocutory orders, which cannot be said to be of binding precedential authority."

"The present stay application is allowed accordingly," it read.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: KeirinindiaNew DelhiDelhi High CourtDelhi delhi high courtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westIndiUk-indiaRepublic of indiaIndia india
Open in App

Related Stories

TechnologyHow To Effortlessly Transfer Data from Android to iPhone Using Apple’s Move to iOS App

NationalDonald Trump Imposes Additional 25% Tariff on India, Total Tariff Now 50%

NationalDelhi: 8 Accused in Vehicle Theft Cases Arrested During Police Patrolling, Stolen Scooters and Bikes Recovered

TechnologyWill the Government Have to Offer More Incentives on EVs? NITI Aayog Raises Concerns Over Slow Sales Growth

OpinionsWhy is Trump So Upset with India?

International Realted Stories

InternationalWe need to stop Russia, we need support from American and European partners: Ukrainian President Zelenskyy

InternationalTrump says 'When, not if' about trilateral meeting with Putin and Zelensky

InternationalBangladesh minority group urges govt to protect sanctity of Hindu pilgrimage site

International"Israel carrying out deliberate campaign of starvation in occupied Gaza Strip": Amnesty International

InternationalZelensky says he had a "very good conversation" with Trump