City
Epaper

Pakistan: Imran Khan's party challenges 26th Constitutional Amendment in Sindh High Court

By ANI | Updated: October 27, 2024 06:15 IST

Islamabad [Pakistan], October 27 : A lawyer for the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) filed a petition in the Sindh High ...

Open in App

Islamabad [Pakistan], October 27 : A lawyer for the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) filed a petition in the Sindh High Court on Saturday challenging the 26th Constitutional Amendment, the Express Tribune reported, citing Express News.

Advocate Ashraf Samo argued that the amendment represents a "direct attack" on the judiciary, which he described as a fundamental pillar of the state.

The petition aims to protect the independence and supremacy of the judiciary as enshrined in Pakistan's 1973 Constitution, specifically under Article 199. Samo requested that the court convene a full bench to hear the case, emphasising the importance of safeguarding fundamental rights, as reported by the Express Tribune.

During a press conference following the petition's filing, PTI's Barrister Ali Tahir raised concerns, stating, "If a flawed law is enacted through an amendment, we can contest it in the high court, which has the authority to issue orders on such matters."

Tahir questioned the legitimacy of the amendment's provision for a special parliamentary committee, asserting that only the Supreme Court has jurisdiction over internal judicial matters. "How can the government form benches? Where is such a law defined?" he asked.

He also highlighted that the amendment could allow the executive to exert undue influence in judicial affairs, particularly in bench formation, a role historically reserved for the judiciary.

Samo's petition also criticised any provision in the amendment allowing for call recordings, claiming it infringes on personal freedoms. He expressed concerns that such changes may threaten judicial independence and set a dangerous precedent, stating, "This nation cannot be governed like a banana republic."

The petition calls for five senior judges to oversee the case to ensure a fair hearing on what he characterised as "a blatant violation of fundamental rights," the Express Tribune reported.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalJapan's Ambassador ONO Keiichi meets UP CM Yogi Adityanath in Lucknow

CricketJamie Smith's brilliant century powers England to 249/5 at lunch, trailing by 338 runs against India (Day 3)

EntertainmentITC Maurya: A home to iconic work of legendary artist Krishen Khanna

BusinessIndian Potash Limited’s Dr. Parvinder Singh Gahlaut supports Krishi Vigyan Kendras

BusinessBEML unveils phase-I aerospace SEZ facility in Bengaluru

International Realted Stories

InternationalHundreds of Chinese spouses in Taiwan refuse to give up China citizenship, threatening Taiwan's laws

InternationalRussia has launched massive aerial attacks on Ukraine: Zelensky

InternationalInternational collaboration, aam ras: Group Captain Shukla shares his experience onboard ISS with students

InternationalChina reiterates its claim to authority over Dalai Lama reincarnation process, cites centuries-old rituals

InternationalItaly: 21 injured in petrol station explosion in Rome, triggers fires, building damage