City
Epaper

SC junks plea seeking Rs 50 lakh ex-gratia for kin of deceased lawyers

By IANS | Updated: September 14, 2021 14:05 IST

New Delhi, Sep 14 The Supreme Court on Tuesday junked a PIL seeking direction to the Centre and ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Sep 14 The Supreme Court on Tuesday junked a PIL seeking direction to the Centre and others to pay Rs 50 lakh ex-gratia to kin of advocates, who died before the age of 60 whether due to Covid-19 or other reasons.

The top court imposed a cost of Rs 10,000 on the petitioner and said life of lawyers cannot be said to be more precious than others.

A bench headed by justice D.Y. Chandrachud noted that the court cannot make an exception for lawyers and cannot encourage filing of bogus PIL by lawyers. The bench also comprising justices Vikram Nath and B.V. Nagarathna told petitioner-in-person advocate Pradeep Kumar Yadav, "Are other people of the society not important". It further added, "This is a publicity interest litigation".

The bench pointed out that several people have succumbed to Covid-19 and cited the judgment passed by the top court dealing with framing of guidelines for compensation to kin of those who have died due to coronavirus. The bench told the lawyer, "Just because you are in black coat does not mean your life is more precious than others".

Yadav had sought Rs 50 lakh for the kin of advocates, who have died within 60 years whether from Covid or any other disease.

The bench reiterated that it is time when it has to stop lawyers from filing bogus PILs. The bench said: "It cannot happen that lawyers file such public interest litigations and demand for compensation from judges and that they will allow". Chiding Yadav, the bench said "You can't be an exception here, Mr Yadav".

The bench also observed that "cut-copy-paste" has been done in the plea and dismissed the petition with a cost of Rs 10,000 payable to the Supreme Court Bar Association within a week.

Yadav argued that all courts are not working, which has impacted the survival of lawyers and their staff. Yadav, in the plea, had arrayed the Centre, Bar Council of India and several other bar bodies as respondents.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtSupreme Court Bar AssociationVikram nath
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Price Fall 3% After SC AGR Relief; Experts Call It a Risky Buy

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Jumps 9%, Touches ₹10 After Supreme Court Grants Relief in AGR Dues

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Price Gains Ahead of Supreme Court Hearing in AGR Dues Case

NationalSupreme Court Awards Compensation to Transgender Woman Terminated by Two Private Schools, Forms Committee on Equal Opportunity Policy

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 4%, Investors Cheer as Stock Surges 22% Over Six Months

International Realted Stories

InternationalJapanese school children visit INS Sahyadri and witness India's rich maritime heritage, cutting-edge indigenous capabilities

InternationalJairam Ramesh mocks "self-styled 56-inch chest" after Trump's 56th claim of stopping India-Pak conflict

InternationalDefence chiefs of US, Japan underline unity against 'severe' Chinese threats

InternationalPM Modi, Japanese PM discuss deepening India-Japan Special Strategic and Global Partnership

InternationalSouth Korean President gifts Trump replica of ancient gold crown, awards highest state medal