City
Epaper

Sri Lanka's top court says China-backed Port City Bill 'inconsistent' with Constitution

By ANI | Updated: May 18, 2021 16:40 IST

Sri Lanka's Supreme Court on Tuesday determined that some clauses in the China-backed Port City Economic Commission Bill are "inconsistent" with the country's Constitution. However, the top court added that these clauses can be made valid if amended.

Open in App

Sri Lanka's Supreme Court on Tuesday determined that some clauses in the China-backed Port City Economic Commission Bill are "inconsistent" with the country's Constitution. However, the top court added that these clauses can be made valid if amended.

Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena told Parliament that the apex court had determined that certain provisions of the Port City Economic Commission Bill are inconsistent with the Constitution, and directed that those clauses required to be passed by a special majority and a referendum as they were unconstitutional, Colombo Page reported.

The decision of the top court was handed over to the Speaker recently after considering 19 petitions filed against the proposed bill.

The Port City Bill was tabled in the Parliament on April 8, after which 19 petitions were filed in the SC. Following the apex court's verdict on these petitions, a parliament debate will be held on May 19 and 20.

The Port City Colombo is a joint venture between Sri Lanka and China. The bill seeks to establish a special commission that will govern the city as a Special Economic Zone (SEZ).

The government has unveiled a contentious draft law for a Colombo Port City Commission which allows for sweeping tax breaks, tax-free salaries and an offshore financial centre.

The USD 1.4-billion Colombo Port City project is slated to be the single largest private sector development in Sri Lanka amid concerns about Beijing seeking to increase its footprint in the country through contentious infrastructure projects.

Sri Lanka has already leased Hambantota port to the Chinese state-run company for a period of 99 years, a move that has caused concern in neighbouring India.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: ManilacolombobeijingSupreme CourtMahinda yapa abeywardena
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

InternationalBeijing Rains: 44 Dead and 9 Missing Due to Torrential Rainfall in China

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

International Realted Stories

InternationalRespect terms of your US visa, authorised period of stay: warns US

InternationalKarti Chidambaram backs India's firm rebuttal to Trump's tariff move

InternationalAir Arabia Abu Dhabi increases flight frequency to Baku, Tbilisi

InternationalUAE conducts 62nd airdrop as part of 'Birds of Goodness' operation, delivers 40 food trucks into Gaza

InternationalEAM inaugurates first BIMSTEC Traditional Music Festival, hails cultural unity among member nations