City
Epaper

Sri Lanka's top court says China-backed Port City Bill 'inconsistent' with Constitution

By ANI | Updated: May 18, 2021 16:40 IST

Sri Lanka's Supreme Court on Tuesday determined that some clauses in the China-backed Port City Economic Commission Bill are "inconsistent" with the country's Constitution. However, the top court added that these clauses can be made valid if amended.

Open in App

Sri Lanka's Supreme Court on Tuesday determined that some clauses in the China-backed Port City Economic Commission Bill are "inconsistent" with the country's Constitution. However, the top court added that these clauses can be made valid if amended.

Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena told Parliament that the apex court had determined that certain provisions of the Port City Economic Commission Bill are inconsistent with the Constitution, and directed that those clauses required to be passed by a special majority and a referendum as they were unconstitutional, Colombo Page reported.

The decision of the top court was handed over to the Speaker recently after considering 19 petitions filed against the proposed bill.

The Port City Bill was tabled in the Parliament on April 8, after which 19 petitions were filed in the SC. Following the apex court's verdict on these petitions, a parliament debate will be held on May 19 and 20.

The Port City Colombo is a joint venture between Sri Lanka and China. The bill seeks to establish a special commission that will govern the city as a Special Economic Zone (SEZ).

The government has unveiled a contentious draft law for a Colombo Port City Commission which allows for sweeping tax breaks, tax-free salaries and an offshore financial centre.

The USD 1.4-billion Colombo Port City project is slated to be the single largest private sector development in Sri Lanka amid concerns about Beijing seeking to increase its footprint in the country through contentious infrastructure projects.

Sri Lanka has already leased Hambantota port to the Chinese state-run company for a period of 99 years, a move that has caused concern in neighbouring India.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: ManilacolombobeijingSupreme CourtMahinda yapa abeywardena
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSupreme Court Clears Way for Local Body Elections in Maharashtra, Retains Pre-2022 OBC Quota

Maharashtra"Local Body Elections Long Overdue, We Are Fully Prepared", Sanjay Raut on SC Order

MaharashtraMaharashtra Local Body Polls 2025: Supreme Court Asks State Commission to Conduct Elections Within 4 Months

EntertainmentSamay Raina and Four Others Summoned by Supreme Court Over Mocking Disabled Individuals

NationalSC Rejects Red Fort Claim by Woman Posing as Mughal Heir: ‘Why Not Fatehpur Sikri Too?’

International Realted Stories

InternationalBangladesh: Police arrest five Awami League leaders, affiliates

InternationalBaloch National Movement launches mobile billboard campaign to condemn arrests and torture of Baloch leaders

International'Operation Sindoor' has raised the cost of supporting terrorism for Pakistan, says Retd Lt. Gen Dua

InternationalPakistan's actions being seen as escalatory, provocative in nature, says Foreign Secretary Misri

InternationalUS Secretary of State dials India, Pakistan counterparts on escalating tensions