City
Epaper

74 years on, India's daughters gaining equality?

By IANS | Published: August 15, 2020 11:10 AM

New Delhi, Aug 15 In a landmark judgement in the days leading upto India's 74th Independence Day, a ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 15 In a landmark judgement in the days leading upto India's 74th Independence Day, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that daughters have an equal right to paternal property by birth, marking a historic moment for women's rights in India.

Welcoming the judgement, Sonam Chandwani, Managing Partner at KS Legal & Associates, said: "With gender equality and equity becoming a fundamental human right, the apex court took a meticulous look at Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act. A society that remains largely patriarchal yet progressive in terms of changing societal dynamics is likely to embrace this judgment with open arms."

Explaining the judgement, she told life: "The decision grants equal coparcenery rights in HUF properties to daughters even if the father passed away before the 2005 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. This... settled the ambiguity surrounding the nature and extent of a daughter's rights in an HUF property... A progressive judgment that places male and female heirs on an equal pedestal of succession breaks the stereotype of a subservient, dependant woman and takes a small stride towards a law that applies to males and females, equitably".

Saying that courts are now recognising the fact that women have always had a rough deal, senior advocate Priya Hingorani - who calls it a progressive judgement - shared that our laws have been retograde, but with judgements like this, women are being put at par and gender discrimination is being done away with. Asked if there is a trend towards women getting their share, she told life over the phone: "This is a trend, but it is slow and should have happened years ago. The mindset in our country is that when girls are married off, there's so much dowry given, it's thought they've got their share, so they should not have any rights in ancestral property. These kind of judgements show that if men are entitled to property, women are equally entitled to property."

Rishabh Shroff, Partner and Co-head - Private Client Practice at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Ks legal & associatesSonam chandwaniPriya hingoraniindiaNew DelhiSupreme CourtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westIndiUk-india
Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalJaishankar Rejects US President Biden’s Remarks, Says, “India Not Xenophobic, but Very Open and Welcoming”

NationalFSSAI Increases Pesticide Residue Limit Tenfold in Herbs and Spices

NationalArvind Kejriwal To Be Released From Jail? We May Consider Granting Interim Bail to Delhi CM, Says Supreme Court

NationalNew Delhi: 18-Year-Old Stabbed to Death by Two Individuals Over Romantic Rivalry

TechnologyWhatsApp Banned?: A Step-by-Step Guide To Unblock Your Number And Account

Lifestyle Realted Stories

LifestyleFive Tips To Lose Weight Without Diet or Exercise

HealthKnow Why Chia Seeds Are a Powerful Addition to Your Diet

LifestyleHow Much Power Does an Air Cooler Consume? All You Need To Know About

HealthWhy People Experience Heart Attacks During Exercise at the Gym; Know Causes and Prevention

HealthStudy Finds Intermittent Fasting and Proper Exercise Timing Crucial for Fat Loss