City
Epaper

74 years on, India's daughters gaining equality?

By IANS | Updated: August 15, 2020 11:25 IST

New Delhi, Aug 15 In a landmark judgement in the days leading upto India's 74th Independence Day, a ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 15 In a landmark judgement in the days leading upto India's 74th Independence Day, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that daughters have an equal right to paternal property by birth, marking a historic moment for women's rights in India.

Welcoming the judgement, Sonam Chandwani, Managing Partner at KS Legal & Associates, said: "With gender equality and equity becoming a fundamental human right, the apex court took a meticulous look at Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act. A society that remains largely patriarchal yet progressive in terms of changing societal dynamics is likely to embrace this judgment with open arms."

Explaining the judgement, she told life: "The decision grants equal coparcenery rights in HUF properties to daughters even if the father passed away before the 2005 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. This... settled the ambiguity surrounding the nature and extent of a daughter's rights in an HUF property... A progressive judgment that places male and female heirs on an equal pedestal of succession breaks the stereotype of a subservient, dependant woman and takes a small stride towards a law that applies to males and females, equitably".

Saying that courts are now recognising the fact that women have always had a rough deal, senior advocate Priya Hingorani - who calls it a progressive judgement - shared that our laws have been retograde, but with judgements like this, women are being put at par and gender discrimination is being done away with. Asked if there is a trend towards women getting their share, she told life over the phone: "This is a trend, but it is slow and should have happened years ago. The mindset in our country is that when girls are married off, there's so much dowry given, it's thought they've got their share, so they should not have any rights in ancestral property. These kind of judgements show that if men are entitled to property, women are equally entitled to property."

Rishabh Shroff, Partner and Co-head - Private Client Practice at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Ks legal & associatesSonam chandwaniPriya hingoraniindiaNew DelhiSupreme CourtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westIndiUk-india
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalHarish Rana Case: SC Praises Family’s Organ Donation Decision After Granting Passive Euthanasia

NationalCrop Ruined by Parrots is 'Damage by Wild Animals', says HC; Gives Relief

InternationalIndian Student in Canada Shares Gruelling Work-Study Routine, Internet Reacts

InternationalDonald Trump Hellhole Remarks: Iran’s Mumbai Consulate Takes Dig at the US President With Cultural Jab

InternationalIranian President Calls for Constructive Role of Brics to Halt West Asia Conflict During Talks With PM Modi

Lifestyle Realted Stories

LifestyleWomen’s Weight Loss Tips: How Many Steps Should Women Over 50 Walk Daily?

LifestyleHow Should Children Prepare for Civil Services and National Service? IFS Ashutosh Kumar Shares the ‘Sewa to Success’ Mantra

LifestyleKnow Why Dermatologists Recommend Wearing Sunscreen Even Inside the House

LifestyleImmunity Booster Foods: Best Diet Tips to Strengthen Your Immune System Naturally

LifestyleToday's Horoscope, May 19, 2026: Check Your Zodiac Sign's Predictions and Birthday Forecast