The Bombay High Court dismissed a petition on Friday that had been filed by Shiv Sena (UBT) MLA Ravindra Waikar. The petition alleged discriminatory allocation of funds for development and infrastructure projects in different constituencies by the Maharashtra government led by Eknath Shinde.
A division bench of Justices S B Shukre and Rajesh Patil noted that the allocation of funds to MLAs for their constituencies was a state policy, and there cannot be a judicial review of the same in the absence of sufficient material to prove discrimination or lack of transparency.
Waikar, in his plea, had alleged that the state government was adopting a discriminatory attitude while allocating government funds to different constituencies for the development of infrastructure and basic civic amenities in slums. He had submitted that the funds are made available to all MLAs equally in Maharashtra from the Maharashtra Local Development Funds, and Rs 11,420 lakh were allocated in 2022-23.
The bench, in its order, noted that substantial funds have been allocated for carrying out different works in constituencies belonging to parties other than the BJP. It also held that the funds allocated to the petitioner’s constituency were Rs 250 lakh, similar to several other constituencies. We do not see any arbitrariness or any instance of impermissible discrimination on the part of the state government in the allocation of the funds, the court said in its judgment.
The bench noted that the decision taken to accord sanction for carrying out different works in different localities and allocating funds for executing those works is an administrative function guided by the state policy. It further held that judicial review of such an administrative function cannot be applied in cases where insufficient material is submitted.