The Bombay High Court has strongly criticized the state government for diverting funds towards ambitious schemes while failing to release rightful dues to retired employees. Expressing sharp displeasure, the court remarked that if there is no money available to pay pensions, then welfare schemes like the Ladki Bahin Yojana should be discontinued. The court’s stern observation highlights concerns over financial priorities, emphasizing that retired staff cannot be deprived of their legitimate benefits. The remarks came during a hearing that exposed serious lapses in ensuring timely payments to former government employees.
The case involves a retired woman employee from the education department of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation who had not received her pension and other dues as per the Seventh Pay Commission. Despite repeated follow-ups, the civic body failed to clear her payments, forcing her to approach the high court for relief. During the proceedings, the court questioned the administration’s functioning and pointed out inconsistencies in its approach. It raised concerns over why senior officials, including additional commissioners, receive their salaries and benefits on time, while teachers who served for years are denied their rightful dues, calling the situation unjust and contradictory.
Also Read: Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: ACB Catches School Headmistress Red-Handed in Bribery Case
The court further criticized the civic body for its failure to implement the Seventh Pay Commission, even as discussions about the Eighth Pay Commission are underway. In a scathing remark, it suggested that if funds are insufficient, the corporation should consider selling office furniture such as tables, chairs, and air conditioners. The court went a step further, stating that luxury vehicles used by top officials could also be sold if needed, but pension payments must not be delayed. Stressing that pensions are a legal right, the court made it clear that employees cannot be deprived of them under any circumstances.
Taking the seriousness of the matter into account, the high court has directed the additional commissioner to submit an affidavit explaining the delay and the steps being taken to resolve the issue. The court’s intervention underscores the urgency of ensuring financial accountability and prioritizing essential obligations over discretionary spending.