City
Epaper

Adani-Hindenburg row: SC refuses to accept Centre's suggestion on Committee, says will maintain transparency

By ANI | Updated: February 17, 2023 22:35 IST

The Supreme Court on Friday said that it will not accept the sealed cover suggestion by the Centre on ...

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Friday said that it will not accept the sealed cover suggestion by the Centre on the appointment of the committee related to regulatory mechanisms to protect the investors in the backdrop of the Adani-Hindenburg case and said that it wants to maintain full transparency.

The court was hearing various petitions related to Hindenburg Research Report.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud reserved the order on the issue and the other issue of the appointment of the committee to oversee regulatory mechanisms related to the market.

One of the petitions filed by advocate Vishal Tiwari sought to Constitute a Committee under the Monitoring of the retired Supreme Court Judge to enquire and Investigate the Hindenburg Research Report.

During the hearing, CJI DY Chandrachud indicated by saying that they will not accept the sealed cover suggestion by the Centre because they want to maintain full transparency.

The court said, "If they accept suggestions in sealed cover it is like they have not kept it away from other side as people will think it is a government-appointed committee."

CJI also indicated by saying that they will appoint the committee and its members on their own.

SG Mehta Tushar Mehta, appearing for Centre, submitted a sealed cover note and said, "Two intentions should be kept in mind, one is that truth comes out and a holistic view is presented and other one is there is an unintended impact on the markets."

Petitioner and lawyer Advocate Vishal Tiwari demanded that the entire thing should be probed and a high-powered committee be constituted to look into it.

Appearing for another petitioner lawyer Prashant Bhushan said he wants to give suggestions on the names of some retired judges as members of the committee. But Supreme Court refuses to accept one of the petitioner lawyer Prashant Bhushan's suggestion of names of some retired judges as members of the Committee.

Petitioner Jaya Thakur's lawyer, advocate Varun Thakur demanded a fair probe.

Another petitioner, advocate ML Sharma, has sought a probe against the US-based firm, whose report has led to shares of Adani group plunging on the bourses.

One of the petitions was filed by Congress leader Jaya Thakur.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Constitute a committeeVishal tiwariPrashant BhushanSupreme CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court levelCanadian supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

NationalCryptocurrency Needs To Be Regulated, Banning Not an Option, Says Supreme Court

MaharashtraPune Porsche Crash: One Year On, 9 Accused Still Behind Bars; Justice Still in Motion

MaharashtraSupreme Court Clears Way for Local Body Elections in Maharashtra, Retains Pre-2022 OBC Quota

Maharashtra"Local Body Elections Long Overdue, We Are Fully Prepared", Sanjay Raut on SC Order

National Realted Stories

NationalContraband worth Rs 5.15 crore seized in Tripura, Mizoram; one arrested

NationalWe don't fear garbage mafia, they can’t blackmail our govt: K'taka Dy CM

NationalKarnataka students safe in Israel and Iran, repatriation soon: CM Siddaramaiah

NationalOdisha Horror: Police Arrest 10 in Connection With Gang Rape of 20-Year-old Teen at Beach

NationalOpportunities for all: Assam CM on visit of tribal students to semiconductor plant