City
Epaper

Advocate's office in residence not subject to property tax as business building: Delhi HC

By IANS | Updated: June 29, 2023 18:00 IST

New Delhi, June 29 The Delhi High Court has held that an advocate's office located in a residential ...

Open in App

New Delhi, June 29 The Delhi High Court has held that an advocate's office located in a residential building should not be subject to property tax as a "business building".

The court said that the professional activity of lawyers should not be considered a commercial activity, and therefore, the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act does not authorise the imposition of taxes on such activities conducted from residential premises.

It referred to the Master Plan for Delhi 2021, which allows professional activities in residential buildings under specific conditions. However, it clarified that this provision does not empower the Corporation to levy taxes on these activities.

The case arose when the South Delhi Municipal Corporation demanded property tax from a lawyer who operated his office from a portion of his residential premises.

A single judge bench's decision, which held advocates' services as professional activities exempt from business establishment taxes, was upheld by the division bench of Justice Najmi Waziri and Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain.

The court emphasised that taxation powers must be explicitly mentioned in the statute and cannot be inferred or presumed. It concluded that the taxation laws and bylaws cannot extend their scope to include professional activities that are not explicitly classified as commercial activities in the applicable statutes.

It cited previous judgments from the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court, which held that the discharge of professional activities by lawyers should not be considered business or commercial establishments. It further stated that taxation powers must be specifically mentioned in the law, rejecting the argument that a lawyer's office should be deemed a business establishment.

In light of these findings, the court dismissed the appeal filed by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation, highlighting that the professional activities of lawyers should not be subject to taxation under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act or the property tax bye-laws.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Sudhir kumar jainDelhi High CourtThe Delhi High CourtSouth Delhi Municipal CorporationDelhi delhi high courtNajmi waziriDelhi high court bar associationDivision bench of delhi high courtThe chief justice of delhi high courtRegistrar general of delhi high courtBar council of delhi and delhi high court bar association
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalTMC MP Mahua Moitra Approaches Delhi High Court Against Ex-Boyfriend Over Custody of Pet Dog Henry

Entertainment‘Celebrities Aren’t Public Property’: Vivek Oberoi’s Lawyer Sana Raees Khan Hails HC Order Protecting His Personality Rights

NationalDelhi Demolition Drive: 5 Cops Injured After Clashes Erupt Over Bulldozer Action Near Faiz-e-Elahi Masjid

EntertainmentSuperstar NTR Secures Landmark Legal Protection for Personality Rights; Actor Thanks Delhi HC Court In Appreciation Post

BusinessAnil Ambani's Reliance Power and Reliance Infra Shares in Focus on Monday After Delhi HC Grants Major Relief in Union Bank Fraud Case

National Realted Stories

National'Womaniya' initiative leads 2.1 lakh women MSEs onto GeM with 13.7 lakh orders

NationalThree-year-old boy trapped in borewell in MP's Ujjain; rescue operation underway

NationalJustice Yashwant Varma of Allahabad HC resigns

NationalTelangana HC grants one week anticipatory bail to Pawan Khera in case filed by Assam CM's wife amid passport row

NationalOne year after cash-at-home row, Allahabad HC Judge Yashwant Varma resigns, probe continues