City
Epaper

Advocate's office in residence not subject to property tax as business building: Delhi HC

By IANS | Updated: June 29, 2023 18:00 IST

New Delhi, June 29 The Delhi High Court has held that an advocate's office located in a residential ...

Open in App

New Delhi, June 29 The Delhi High Court has held that an advocate's office located in a residential building should not be subject to property tax as a "business building".

The court said that the professional activity of lawyers should not be considered a commercial activity, and therefore, the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act does not authorise the imposition of taxes on such activities conducted from residential premises.

It referred to the Master Plan for Delhi 2021, which allows professional activities in residential buildings under specific conditions. However, it clarified that this provision does not empower the Corporation to levy taxes on these activities.

The case arose when the South Delhi Municipal Corporation demanded property tax from a lawyer who operated his office from a portion of his residential premises.

A single judge bench's decision, which held advocates' services as professional activities exempt from business establishment taxes, was upheld by the division bench of Justice Najmi Waziri and Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain.

The court emphasised that taxation powers must be explicitly mentioned in the statute and cannot be inferred or presumed. It concluded that the taxation laws and bylaws cannot extend their scope to include professional activities that are not explicitly classified as commercial activities in the applicable statutes.

It cited previous judgments from the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court, which held that the discharge of professional activities by lawyers should not be considered business or commercial establishments. It further stated that taxation powers must be specifically mentioned in the law, rejecting the argument that a lawyer's office should be deemed a business establishment.

In light of these findings, the court dismissed the appeal filed by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation, highlighting that the professional activities of lawyers should not be subject to taxation under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act or the property tax bye-laws.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Sudhir kumar jainDelhi High CourtThe Delhi High CourtSouth Delhi Municipal CorporationDelhi delhi high courtNajmi waziriDelhi high court bar associationDivision bench of delhi high courtThe chief justice of delhi high courtRegistrar general of delhi high courtBar council of delhi and delhi high court bar association
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi High Court Directs Social Media Intermediaries to Take Action Within 7 Days on Pawan Kalyan’s Personality Rights Plea

BusinessAnil Ambani Files Defamation Case Against Cobrapost Over Defamatory' Reporting

EntertainmentSunjay Kapur Property Dispute: Delhi HC Backs Karisma Kapoor’s Children, Rejects Priya Kapur’s Secrecy Bid

EntertainmentAR Rahman Secures Relief as Delhi High Court Overturns Single-Judge Order in Veera Raja Veera Copyright Case

NationalSupreme Court Adjourns Hearing on Bail Pleas of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and Others in Delhi Riots Case

National Realted Stories

NationalB’desh leader’s remarks on Northeast irresponsible and dangerous: Assam CM

NationalBank credit growth stays resilient with 11.5 pc growth: Centre

NationalWar of words erupts between Central agency and Bengal Minister over giving security cover to Lionel Messi in Kolkata

NationalBihar: Interstate cyber fraud gang busted, 4 arrested

NationalRabi crop sowing crosses 536 lakh hectares