City
Epaper

AI 'pee-gate': With accused Mishra now trying to shift blame to victim, the staring unanswered questions

By IANS | Updated: January 13, 2023 20:00 IST

New Delhi, Jan 13 In the latest twist in the Air India urination incident, Shankar Mishra, accused of ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 13 In the latest twist in the Air India urination incident, Shankar Mishra, accused of relieving himself on an elderly woman co-passenger while in a drunken state, on Friday sought to recant from any involvement in the episode and brazenly accused the victim of soiling her own seat. However, his attempt at evading any responsibility may not succeed as it leaves many questions unanswered.

Here are the dozen questions at least that crop up after Mishra's dramatic volte face to avoid any punitive action for the act, which was termed "utterly disgusting and repulsive" and itself is sufficient to outrage the modesty of a woman by Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House courts, Komal Garg, while rejecting his bail plea.

The prime question that rises is why was Mishra not cooperating in the investigation earlier?

#2 As even the court had said, why was Mishra deliberately avoiding joining the investigation?

#3 Mishra had accepted before the court that a settlement was done and compensation was paid to the elderly woman. When Mishra says he did not pee on her, what did he pay the lady for?

#4 As per the accused's and the woman's WhatsaApp chat where he accepted his fault, why did Mishra get her clothes and bags cleaned on November 28 and delivered on November 30?

#5 Why did Mishra pay the compensation as agreed upon between both parties on PayTM on November 28?

#6 Before the court, Mishra had also said that he has full faith in the judicial system of the country and will cooperate with the investigation process. Why does he now say that he wasn't the one who peed?

#7 Mishra's changing stand also makes us ponder why did his father message the victim on WhatsApp saying karma will hit her and later delete the message?

#8 If not for peeing on the woman and not for the purpose of any sexual desire - as he told the court, what did he unzip his pants for?

#9 Why could not Mishra control his drink? He had accepted the fact that he was drunk and voluntarily consumed alcohol during the night?

#10 As he claims, it was not him, then who urinated on the woman?

#11 What makes Mishra - and how can he - say that the woman was suffering from some prostate-related disease?

#12 What was the seating system like on the plane? When he says that he hasn't peed on her, how can he claim that it must be someone else who peed on her?

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Metropolitan magistrateShankar mishraindiaNew DelhiPatiala HouseThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westIndiUk-indiaRepublic of indiaIndia india
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalCOVID-19 Update: Mumbai Cases Drop Sharply; India’s Active Tally Drops By 428

CricketIndia vs India A Intra-Squad LIVE Streaming: When and Where To Watch Intra-Squad Match on TV and Online?

Navi MumbaiNavi Mumbai News: Border Crackdown Forces Indian Woman to Part With Children and Husband Amid Citizenship Chaos

NationalAir India Plane Crash in Gujarat: Could This Be One of India’s Deadliest Air Disasters? Here Are Top 5 Worst Aviation Tragedies

HealthCOVID-19: What is XFG? New Recombinant Variant Detected With Rapid Spread Potential

National Realted Stories

NationalMP: Congress workers clash during ‘Sangathan Srijan’ meeting in Bhopal

NationalBengal: Two more accused arrested in Murshidabad violence case

NationalBihar Minister Santosh Suman accuses Lalu Yadav of insulting Dalits, demands apology

NationalDharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan will empower tribals: MP Guv

NationalIndia walks diplomatic tightrope amid escalating Iran-Israel tensions: Wing Commander Praful Bakshi