City
Epaper

Andhra liquor scam: ED seizes incriminating material during searches

By IANS | Updated: September 19, 2025 21:50 IST

Hyderabad, Sep 19 The searches conducted by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) at various places in the country ...

Open in App

Hyderabad, Sep 19 The searches conducted by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) at various places in the country in connection with the Andhra Pradesh liquor scam led to the recovery and seizure of incriminating material evidencing bogus/inflated transactions leading to the generation and movement of Proceeds of Crime, the agency said in a statement on Friday.

Searches also led to the seizure of bogus invoices and transport challans containing non-transport vehicle details; parallel invoices evidencing differential and inflated prices; chats evidencing involvement of certain accused persons who are absconding and believed to be in Dubai, and transfer of Proceeds of Crime (POC) to them, the agency statement said.

Unaccounted cash of Rs 38 lakh was seized from one of the premises. Ledgers indicating remittance abroad of POC worth several crores were also seized, it said.

The ED's Hyderabad Zonal Office conducted searches on Thursday at 20 locations in Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Thanjavur, Surat, Raipur, Delhi NCR, and Andhra Pradesh under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in connection with the liquor scam.

Searches were conducted at the premises of entities/individuals who facilitated payment of kickbacks through bogus/inflated transactions.

The agency initiated an investigation on the basis of an FIR registered by A.P. CID under various sections of the IPC for loss to the government exchequer to the tune of Rs 4,000 crore. On February 5, the Andhra Pradesh Government constituted a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate the case.

The FIR alleged that the in ‘new liquor policy’ from October, 2019 to March, 2024, the accused persons indulged in ‘brand killing and new brand promotion’ which involved sidelining popular liquor brands (like McDowell’s, Royal Stag, Imperial Blue, etc.) that refused to pay kickbacks and instead promoting new or spurious brands in exchange for huge payments from distilleries and suppliers. The procurement system was shifted from automated to manual, giving scope for manipulation in the Order for Supply (OFS).

The SIT has filed a charge sheet and supplementary charge sheets, inter alia, alleging replacement of automated system with manual approvals, allowing manipulation of brand-wise indenting and supply volumes; favouring select group of distilleries and marketing firms; coercing suppliers into paying 15–20 per cent of their invoice value as kickbacks, failing which their brands were suppressed or delisted; creating shell distilleries to channel funds and secure inflated OFS volumes; appointing key officials who facilitated brand approvals, manipulated eligibility norms, and suppressed dissenting suppliers.

The charge sheets also allege that kickbacks were generated through procurement manipulation, fake vendor payments, shell companies and were used for election purposes, personal benefit and transfer of funds abroad.

The ED investigation revealed that certain accused persons deliberately discouraged the placement of orders for established brands; withheld legitimate payments owed to the distilleries; and exerted pressure on distilleries & demanded illicit payments/kickbacks in lieu of OFS.

Money trail investigation by the ED revealed that part of the payments given by Andhra Pradesh State Beverages Corporation Limited (APSBCL) to the suppliers were transferred to various entities on the pretext of the supply of goods or services. However, these transactions were found to be bogus and the recipients of these funds were either non-existent, shell entities or unrelated persons/entities.

In several cases, where the entities were related to their line of business, the transactions were found to be inflated. Funds were also transferred by the suppliers to jewellers to acquire gold/cash, which were handed over to the accused persons as kickbacks. Thus, bogus/inflated transactions were used to siphon off funds under the guise of business transactions, thereby facilitating the generation and movement of illicit funds in the form of kickbacks to the accused persons.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Other Sports'Vaiball' takes over IPL 2026: 15-yr-old Sooryavanshi stuns cricket world with explosive knock

Cricket"Everyone loves him": RR skipper Riyan Parag on Vaibhav Sooryavanshi after RR's win over RCB

Cricket"I try to play the ball and not the bowler": Orange Cap holder Vaibhav Sooryavanshi after POTM-winning performance against RCB

National132 devotees from Ludhiana had come for 'darshan', says DM CP Singh on Mathura boat accident

CricketIPL 2026 Standings: Updated Points Table After Rajasthan Royals vs Royal Challengers Bengaluru​​​​​​​ Match

National Realted Stories

NationalAI Summit protest case: Court grants interim protection to IYC member, directs him to join investigation

NationalTripura emerges fastest-growing economies in NE, attracts Rs 2,000 cr investment interest at Bengaluru conclave

NationalUGC secretary Manish Joshi to be relieved; Shyama Rath to take charge

National'Only expert status, no right to conduct technical review': UK regulator responds to families over Air India crash probe

NationalAndhra govt clears Rs 9.36 lakh crore investments in 22 months