City
Epaper

Bengal primary teachers’ recruitment case: Argument concludes at Calcutta HC, judgement reserved

By IANS | Updated: November 12, 2025 23:50 IST

Kolkata, Nov 12 The six-month-long argument in the case on irregularities in the recruitment of 32,000 primary teachers ...

Open in App

Kolkata, Nov 12 The six-month-long argument in the case on irregularities in the recruitment of 32,000 primary teachers in state-run schools in West Bengal concluded at a division bench of the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.

However, the division bench of Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Ritabrata Kumar Mitra reserved the judgment in the matter and also did not specify any date by which that would be pronounced.

The hearing in the matter at the division bench of the Calcutta High Court started on April 28, 2025.

On Wednesday, the state government counsel, in his closing statements, argued that the petitioners in the case alleging irregularities in the appointment of 32,000 primary teachers could not provide sufficient documentary evidence in support of their claims, and hence, there was no ground in their allegations.

However, the CPI(M) Rajya Sabha member and the counsel for the petitioners, Bikas Ranjan Bhattacvharya, argued in his closing statement that this was a typical case of institutional corruption, where all prescribed norms relating to teachers’ appointments were violated.

To recall, in May 2023, the single-judge bench of the then judge of Calcutta High Court and the current BJP Lok Sabha member, Abhijit Gangopadhyay, ordered the cancellation of 32,000 primary teacher jobs in the state.

Gangopadhyay passed the order acting on petitions filed by some candidates alleging that many secured recommendations for appointments despite ranking much lower in the recruitment examinations than many of the deprived candidates.

The state government challenged that order at the division bench, and the matter was referred to the bench headed by Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Smita Das De.

However, Justice Sen recently recused from hearing in the matter, following which the case was referred for hearing to the bench of Justice Chakraborty and Justice Mitra.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalChina agrees to control chemical subsidiaries, lists 13 precursors utilised to make Fentanyl: FBI Director

InternationalMEA announces successful rollout of Passport Seva Programme, Global Passport Seva Programme and e-Passport

CricketSeveral members of Sri Lanka team in Pakistan seek permission to return home following Islamabad blast

Other SportsATP Finals: Salisbury/Skupski stay perfect, close in on semifinals

AurangabadTwo cyber fraudsters arrested for blackmailing cash receivers after online transfers

National Realted Stories

NationalEAM Jaishankar highlights India’s role as ‘first-responder’ at G7 maritime security session

NationalEAM Jaishankar holds talks with Saudi Foreign Minister at G7 meetings in Canada

NationalBengal govt extends ban on gutkha, pan masala products for one more year

NationalDelhi Red Fort Blast: Union Cabinet Directs ‘Utmost Urgency’ in Hunting Down Terror Perpetrators

NationalSIR in Bengal: TMC to raise two questions in Supreme Court