City
Epaper

Bengal school job case: Hearing concludes, verdict reserved

By IANS | Updated: March 20, 2024 15:30 IST

Kolkata, March 20 The hearing in the cash-for-school-job case at a Special Division Bench of the Calcutta High ...

Open in App

Kolkata, March 20 The hearing in the cash-for-school-job case at a Special Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court concluded on Wednesday, but the verdict was reserved.

The Division Bench of Justice Debangsu Basak and Justice Shabbar Rashidi had kept the verdict on reserve for the time being.

At the end of the hearing, Justice Basak made two significant observations.

He said there was nothing good in the entire recruitment process and, recruitments had been made in excess of the vacant posts and those extra appointments need to be terminated.

On the last day of the hearing, CPI(M) Rajya Sabha member and Senior Advocate of the Calcutta High Court, Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, who had been appearing on behalf of the candidates deprived of jobs illegally, made a forceful argument.

“This was a well-planned conspiracy and crime, where recruitments were made in excess of vacant posts to make room for ineligible ones against financial considerations.

“Public money had been wasted in this recruitment process. Action needs to be taken against the state government officials involved in the conspiracy. The Calcutta High Court needs to take an exemplary step in the matter. Else such corruption will recur. The offenders will get a free hand in continuing with their corrupt actions,” argued Bhattacharya.

On the other hand, the counsel of the candidates whose appointment is in question, on the last day of the hearing, cast doubts on the efficiency of the investigation carried out by the CBI and ED in the matter.

“The findings of the investigations by these two agencies in the matter are not trustworthy. The court should rather rely on its own independent assessment in the matter,” the counsel argued.

To this point, Justice Basak raised a counter question on who else, other than the investigation agencies, the court would depend on.

“This court even gave a chance to the candidates to examine their OMR sheets.” he observed.

Thereafter, the hearing concluded and the Division Bench reserved the verdict for the time being.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalIsrael strikes Hezbollah's multiple weapon storage sites in Southern Lebanon

Other SportsWTT Feeder Series 2026: Manush Shah, Ryu Hanna win men's and women's singles titles

Cricket"Nice to be able to contribute to this group": Sophie Devine after Gujarat Giants' narrow win

EntertainmentHrithik Roshan shares pictures from birthday bash featuring girlfriend Saba Azad, ex-wife Sussanne Khan

Other SportsWPL 2026: Gardner highlights contribution of Indian players after GG beat DC by four runs

National Realted Stories

NationalSomnath temple was established in Satyug by Moon God: Swami Swaprakash

National‘Will bury BJP leaders alive' in 2026: TMC MLA’s remarks spark controversy

NationalMizoram, Arunachal seek extra Central funds for infra development in pre-budget meeting

NationalCongress Screening Committee Chairman for Bengal says decision on alliance in poll-bound state soon

NationalPriyanka Gandhi slams police action on NSUI protesters in Varanasi, calls scrapping of MGNREGA 'reprehensible'