City
Epaper

Bengal teachers’ recruitment case: Calcutta HC raises questions on investigation progress

By IANS | Updated: September 2, 2025 21:35 IST

Kolkata, Sep 2 The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday raised questions about the progress of the Central Bureau ...

Open in App

Kolkata, Sep 2 The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday raised questions about the progress of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the primary teachers' recruitment corruption case in state-run schools, and asked the CBI when its probe into the case will be completed.

While hearing the case, a division bench of Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Ritabrata Kumar Mitra observed that none of them knows when the investigation into the corruption in the recruitment of primary teachers will be completed.

The high court also said that until the investigation is completed, it is not possible to know who got the job through corruption and who is involved in that corruption.

The High Court has been hearing the case of the cancellation of 32,000 teaching jobs in state-run primary schools. Earlier, arguments were made on behalf of the state government and the West Bengal Primary Education Board.

Lawyer for the petitioners, Soumya Majumdar, argued before the court that the primary board did not publish the merit list correctly. A lot of complications were created in publishing the merit list; therefore, if there is any error, it cannot be easily detected.

Justice Chakraborty countered him by saying what procedure should have been followed for publishing the merit list. Was it supposed to be published according to any specific rule? asked the court. The lawyer said that there is no rule for this. However, in such jobs, a district-wise transparent list of trained, untrained, caste, subject and number-based lists should have been published.

The court observed that the cancellation of the jobs of so many teachers will have an impact on their families. They have already served for five years. The case has been going on for almost two years. The court wanted to know what could be an alternative to this and posted the matter for hearing next on September 11.

--IANS

sch/dan

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalFrance, Saudi to lead conference on two-state solution in NY: Macron urges US to revise decision on Palestinian visas

International'Can't fight China alone in Asia-Pacific': Former United States Official stresses India's importance for US

InternationalIndian refiners' "signalling" reduction of Russian oil imports, claims US Congressman after visit to India, Pakistan

InternationalPakistan: 14 killed, 35 injured in blast targeting Balochistan National Party rally in Quetta

International"We get along with India very well, but...": Trump defends 50% tariff, calls ties "one sided"

National Realted Stories

NationalInfighting in Karnataka Cong: If CM post is offered, anyone can quit party, sacked minister’s son targets Shivakumar

NationalIndian Heritage Hotels Association demands GST exemption for foreign tourists

NationalK'taka: Greater Bengaluru Authority comes into force; ward delimitation by Nov 1

NationalCongress, BJP say Kavitha’s suspension result of dispute over sharing of corruption money

NationalChidambaram questions credibility of Tianjin Declaration signed by Pakistan