City
Epaper

Big relief for Future group, SC sets aside HC directions for coercive steps

By IANS | Updated: February 1, 2022 11:50 IST

New Delhi, Feb 1 In a relief to Future group companies, the Supreme Court on Monday set aside ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 1 In a relief to Future group companies, the Supreme Court on Monday set aside Delhi High Court order, which initiated coercive steps against the firm and its promoters for alleged violation of the emergency award (EA) passed by the Singapore Arbitration Tribunal.

A bench headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana set aside the orders passed by the single bench of the high court, ordering coercive steps against Future group, and also the order passed in October last year, where the high court refused to stay the tribunal's refusal to vacate the EA, restraining Future deal with Reliance. The top court has asked the high court to decide all matters on merits afresh.

On January 11, the Future Group submitted before the Supreme Court that Future Retail Ltd. will sink with its 30,000 employees, if it's over Rs 24,000 crore with Reliance Retail fails to reach fruition. Senior advocates Harish Salve and K.V. Viswanathan represented Future in the top court. After hearing detailed arguments, the top court on January 11 reserved the judgment.

Salve submitted that the company is in a precious financial situation due to the Covid pandemic, and if its deal with Reliance is obstructed, then 30,000 employees may lose their jobs. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Future Coupons, submitted the assets of the promoters of the Future Group are hypothecated, and if the deal with Reliance fails to go through then everybody will sink, pointing at thousands of employees.

The Future Coupons and Future Retail have moved the top court challenging the Delhi High Court's single bench March 2021 order, directing attachment of assets of Future group companies and its promoters for breach of Emergency Award by Singapore Tribunal. Both sides have so far filed several cases at various forums, which include the apex court, Delhi High Court, and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC).

In 2020, Amazon invoked arbitration after Future Retail announced its asset sale deal with Reliance Industries Ltd wholly owned subsidiary, Reliance Retail.

In December last year, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) had imposed a penalty of Rs 202 crore on Amazon and suspended its approval for the e-tailer's deal with Future Coupons, a promoter firm of the group's public listed company Future Retail Ltd, seeking more information. The US e-commerce giant has challenged the CCI order at the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: New DelhiusSupreme CourtDelhi High CourtHarish Salve
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessAnil Ambani's Reliance Power and Reliance Infra Stocks Fall After SC Issues Notice on Plea for Probe Into Alleged ADAG Bank Fraud

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Jump 3% Today as Telecom Stock Rises 75% in Three Months Amid Strong Market Momentum

BusinessAnil Ambani Files Defamation Case Against Cobrapost Over Defamatory' Reporting

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise 2% as Global Brokerage Sees 36% Upside, Maintains ‘Buy’ Rating

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Jumps 5% in a Single Day After Strong Q2 Results; Stock Hits ₹10

National Realted Stories

National'Some parties on mission to protect infiltrators': Amit Shah on Bengal CM’s plea to halt SIR 

NationalNo confusion in Congress, says K'taka HM on 'leadership crisis' in party

NationalElection Commission debunks vote-voter mismatch theory in Bihar polls

National23-year chase ends as Delhi Police cracks 2002 Sarita Vihar double murder case; two fugitives arrested

NationalMamata Banerjee wants to win Bengal polls through her illegal vote bank: BJP on SIR row