City
Epaper

Bilkis Bano case: SC judge recuses from hearing plea against release of convicts

By IANS | Updated: December 13, 2022 15:30 IST

New Delhi, Dec 13 A Supreme Court judge, Justice Bela M. Trivedi, on Tuesday recused from hearing the ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Dec 13 A Supreme Court judge, Justice Bela M. Trivedi, on Tuesday recused from hearing the petition filed by Bilkis Bano against the release of 11 men convicted of gang-raping her in the 2002 Gujarat riots, and also accused of murdering her family members.

The matter was listed before a bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and Bela Trivedi. Justice Trivedi chose to recuse from the case.

In the plea, Bano said release of all the convicts came as a shock.

The petition, filed through advocate Shobha Gupta, said: "The premature release of all the convicts came as a shock not only to the petitioner, to her grown up daughters, to her family, but also to the society at large, nationally and internationally, and the society across segments had shown their anger, disappointment, distrust and protest to the clemency shown by the government by releasing criminals like the 11 convicts of the case."

Terming the release order mechanical, the plea said the en masse premature release of the convicts in the much talked about case of Bilkis Bano, has shaken the conscience of the society and resulted in a number of agitations across the country.

The plea contended that shocking news of premature release of all the convicts, including the writ petitioner, was revealed to the present petitioner and public at large when the convicts were honoured and photographed in full public glare.

Bilkis Bano said she was "extremely-extremely" hurt, disturbed, and full of dejection with the early release and sudden and traumatising presence and existence of 11 of her rapists who brutally gang-raped her while she was five months pregnant and inflicted on her person and soul extreme level of violence and brutality.

Bano has also separately filed a review petition against challenging the May 13 judgment of the apex court, saying that Maharashtra's remission policy should be applied in the present case instead of 1992 remission policy of Gujarat since the trial had happened in Maharashtra.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Bilkis DadiSupreme CourtBela trivediSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court levelCanadian supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

NationalCryptocurrency Needs To Be Regulated, Banning Not an Option, Says Supreme Court

MaharashtraPune Porsche Crash: One Year On, 9 Accused Still Behind Bars; Justice Still in Motion

MaharashtraSupreme Court Clears Way for Local Body Elections in Maharashtra, Retains Pre-2022 OBC Quota

Maharashtra"Local Body Elections Long Overdue, We Are Fully Prepared", Sanjay Raut on SC Order

National Realted Stories

NationalAkal Takht granthi defends killing of social media influencer for ‘promoting’ vulgarity

NationalIndia at forefront of the global digital economy in 11 years: Arundhati Bhattacharya

NationalDelhi: Govt official held for defrauding colleague of Rs 24 lakh with illegal UPI transactions

NationalAndhra Pradesh: Woman Assaulted and Humiliated Over Unpaid Loan by Creditors; Disturbing Video Emerges

NationalEOW recovers assets worth Rs 1.84 crore from Indore Municipal official in disproportionate assets