City
Epaper

Calcutta HC refuses ad-interim bail to law student held for hurting religious sentiments, seeks case diary

By IANS | Updated: June 3, 2025 16:08 IST

Kolkata, June 3 The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday denied ad-interim bail to Sharmistha Panoli, the 22-year-old law ...

Open in App

Kolkata, June 3 The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday denied ad-interim bail to Sharmistha Panoli, the 22-year-old law student arrested recently by Kolkata Police on charges of hurting religious sentiments and promoting disharmony and hatred.

As her counsel approached the High Court, challenging the trial court’s order last week sending her to judicial custody till June 13, the matter came up for hearing before the vacation bench of Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee.

However, Justice Chatterjee denied any relief to Panoli, observing that the freedom of speech in the country does not allow anyone to hurt anyone’s religious sentiment.

An FIR was registered against Panoli at Garden Reach Police Station on May 15 for posting an Instagram video, where she made some comments on 'Operation Sindoor' that had reportedly hurt the religious sentiments of a particular community.

In the face of strong criticism, she deleted that video and also tendered a public apology for the matter. However, based on the FIR registered, the police first sent her a notice, which failed since she had gone into hiding in Gurugram by then.

Thereafter, an arrest warrant was issued against her, and finally, she was arrested from Gurugram by Kolkata Police on Saturday morning and was brought back to Kolkata on transit remand on the same day.

Rejecting the ad-interim bail, Justice Chatterjee observed that the video posted on social media had reportedly hurt the religious sentiments of a section of people. "We have freedom of speech, but that doesn’t mean you will go on to hurt others. Our country is diverse, with all people. We must be cautious," he said.

He directed the police to submit the case diary in the matter by the next date of hearing on June 5.

The vacation bench also directed the state government to ensure that police do not pursue any other complaint filed against Panoli in any other police station. It also directed the police not to register any fresh complaints in the same matter.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

ThaneThane-Ghodbunder Slip Road to Remain Shut at Night from June 7 to 9 — Check Timings and Alternate Routes

Other SportsPillarisetty ends pole drought on opening day of National Motorcycle Championship

Other SportsElavenil, Ramita, Maddeneni among 20 other athletes to represent India at ISSF Shooting World Cup

EntertainmentMirzapur Season 4 Coming Soon? Shweta Tripathi aka Golu Drops Major Update

Entertainment'Ravana Kootam' producer Kannan Ravi donates Rs 5 lakh to late director Vikram Sugumaran’s family

National Realted Stories

NationalOdisha to prepare spl roadmap for development of disputed Kotia region bordering Andhra

NationalEAM Jaishankar meets delegations led by Supriya Sule and Shrikant Shinde

NationalDelhi court acquits former Coal Secretary Gupta, other officials in coal scam case

NationalG7 Summit invite to PM Modi shatters Opposition's 'foreign policy failure' narrative

NationalBihar: Ayushman Bharat beneficiaries get free treatment, thank govt