City
Epaper

Calcutta HC refuses ad-interim bail to law student held for hurting religious sentiments, seeks case diary

By IANS | Updated: June 3, 2025 16:08 IST

Kolkata, June 3 The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday denied ad-interim bail to Sharmistha Panoli, the 22-year-old law ...

Open in App

Kolkata, June 3 The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday denied ad-interim bail to Sharmistha Panoli, the 22-year-old law student arrested recently by Kolkata Police on charges of hurting religious sentiments and promoting disharmony and hatred.

As her counsel approached the High Court, challenging the trial court’s order last week sending her to judicial custody till June 13, the matter came up for hearing before the vacation bench of Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee.

However, Justice Chatterjee denied any relief to Panoli, observing that the freedom of speech in the country does not allow anyone to hurt anyone’s religious sentiment.

An FIR was registered against Panoli at Garden Reach Police Station on May 15 for posting an Instagram video, where she made some comments on 'Operation Sindoor' that had reportedly hurt the religious sentiments of a particular community.

In the face of strong criticism, she deleted that video and also tendered a public apology for the matter. However, based on the FIR registered, the police first sent her a notice, which failed since she had gone into hiding in Gurugram by then.

Thereafter, an arrest warrant was issued against her, and finally, she was arrested from Gurugram by Kolkata Police on Saturday morning and was brought back to Kolkata on transit remand on the same day.

Rejecting the ad-interim bail, Justice Chatterjee observed that the video posted on social media had reportedly hurt the religious sentiments of a section of people. "We have freedom of speech, but that doesn’t mean you will go on to hurt others. Our country is diverse, with all people. We must be cautious," he said.

He directed the police to submit the case diary in the matter by the next date of hearing on June 5.

The vacation bench also directed the state government to ensure that police do not pursue any other complaint filed against Panoli in any other police station. It also directed the police not to register any fresh complaints in the same matter.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

TechnologyVaccines prevented over 2.5 million Covid deaths worldwide: Study

NationalHimachal Pradesh gets funds to conserve snow leopard habitat

AurangabadMan assaults friend over Rs 10 sachet

NationalRajasthan BJP chief Madan Rathore conferred with Sansad Ratna Award

NationalMamata cites NGO report to back claim of harassment of Bengalis in BJP-ruled states

National Realted Stories

NationalDelhi Crime News: 22-Year-Old Stabbed By Neighbour Over Money Dispute, Five Arrested

NationalSecurity forces recover arms, 728 different types of ammunition in Manipur

NationalElevated corridor over Munak Canal to reduce traffic congestion: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta

NationalCong leaders in Kerala shocked after party leader says Left will form govt again in leaked audio

NationalAAP leadership hurts Sikhs' sentiments, says BJP leader Lalpura