City
Epaper

Calcutta HC refuses ad-interim bail to law student held for hurting religious sentiments, seeks case diary

By IANS | Updated: June 3, 2025 16:08 IST

Kolkata, June 3 The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday denied ad-interim bail to Sharmistha Panoli, the 22-year-old law ...

Open in App

Kolkata, June 3 The Calcutta High Court on Tuesday denied ad-interim bail to Sharmistha Panoli, the 22-year-old law student arrested recently by Kolkata Police on charges of hurting religious sentiments and promoting disharmony and hatred.

As her counsel approached the High Court, challenging the trial court’s order last week sending her to judicial custody till June 13, the matter came up for hearing before the vacation bench of Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee.

However, Justice Chatterjee denied any relief to Panoli, observing that the freedom of speech in the country does not allow anyone to hurt anyone’s religious sentiment.

An FIR was registered against Panoli at Garden Reach Police Station on May 15 for posting an Instagram video, where she made some comments on 'Operation Sindoor' that had reportedly hurt the religious sentiments of a particular community.

In the face of strong criticism, she deleted that video and also tendered a public apology for the matter. However, based on the FIR registered, the police first sent her a notice, which failed since she had gone into hiding in Gurugram by then.

Thereafter, an arrest warrant was issued against her, and finally, she was arrested from Gurugram by Kolkata Police on Saturday morning and was brought back to Kolkata on transit remand on the same day.

Rejecting the ad-interim bail, Justice Chatterjee observed that the video posted on social media had reportedly hurt the religious sentiments of a section of people. "We have freedom of speech, but that doesn’t mean you will go on to hurt others. Our country is diverse, with all people. We must be cautious," he said.

He directed the police to submit the case diary in the matter by the next date of hearing on June 5.

The vacation bench also directed the state government to ensure that police do not pursue any other complaint filed against Panoli in any other police station. It also directed the police not to register any fresh complaints in the same matter.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

HealthRajasthan govt deploys over 3,600 teams after child deaths in Salumber

BusinessGovt aims to raise farmers’ incomes and ensure India’s food, nutrition security: Chouhan

NationalBihar: Former minister’s son-in-law alleges his sister murdered; seeks SIT probe

NationalAndhra: Chandrababu Naidu vows to make Fire Dept a role model

NationalRajasthan govt deploys over 3,600 teams after child deaths in Salumber

National Realted Stories

NationalGovt aims to raise farmers’ incomes and ensure India’s food, nutrition security: Chouhan

NationalBihar: Ex-Kishanganj DSP suspended in disproportionate assets case

NationalMaha Cabinet clears establishment of new Electronics, IT & AI dept

NationalKerala BJP upbeat as Rajeev Chandrasekhar targets Left

NationalK’taka seer faces rape, blackmail allegations; files counter-complaint