New Delhi, June 26 The Supreme Court is slated to hear on Monday a plea filed by Justice Yashwant Varma challenging his indictment by the three-member in-house committee in the cash-discovery episode.
The hearing assumes as 145 MPs from both the ruling and Opposition parties on July 21 had submitted an impeachment notice to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla seeking removal of Justice Varma.
As per the causelist published on the website of the apex court, a Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih will take up the matter for hearing on July 28.
The writ petition filed by Justice Varma sought to quash the communication forwarded by former CJI Sanjiv Khanna to the President and then Prime Minister to take action.
As per the petition, the in-house panel acted in a “pre-determined manner” and denied Justice Varma a fair opportunity to defend himself.
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court indicated that the Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai-led Bench will not likely take up Justice Varma’s plea for hearing after senior advocate Kapil Sibal mentioned it for urgent listing.
“I think that it may not be proper for me to pick up that matter because I was part of the conversation,” said CJI Gavai but had assured Sibal that a Bench will be constituted to hear the matter.
Justice Varma has been in the eye of a storm since the March 14 discovery of the burnt cash in an outhouse of his official residence allotted to him while serving in the Delhi High Court.
Following the cash-discovery row, which sent shockwaves across the judicial corridors, Justice Varma was repatriated to the Allahabad High Court, and an in-house probe was set up to probe the allegations.
According to the probe committee, both direct and electronic evidence confirmed that the storeroom was under the covert or active control of Justice Varma and his family.
In conclusion, the three-member inquiry committee, comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, CJ G.S. Sandhawalia of the Himachal Pradesh HC and Karnataka HC’s Justice Anu Sivaraman, found the allegations serious enough to merit impeachment proceedings against Justice Varma.
It opined that Justice Varma’s misconduct was not only proven but also grave enough to warrant his removal under Article 124(4) of the Constitution.
Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor