City
Epaper

‘Ceased to exist in reality’: SC dissolves 25-year-old marriage

By IANS | Updated: December 16, 2025 18:15 IST

New Delhi, Dec 16 The Supreme Court has dissolved a 25-year-old marriage, holding that it had "ceased to ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Dec 16 The Supreme Court has dissolved a 25-year-old marriage, holding that it had "ceased to exist in reality" and that there was no possibility of reconciliation.

Allowing a petition filed by the husband, a bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Joymalya Bagchi invoked its extraordinary powers to do "complete justice between the parties" and granted divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown.

The Justice Manmohan-headed Bench set aside a 2011 Gauhati High Court judgment that had overturned a divorce decree granted by a trial court in Shillong.

"The parties have lived separately for far too long a period of time, and there is no sanctity left in the marriage. Also, rapprochement is not in the realm of possibility," the apex court observed, noting that the couple had been living apart since November 2001 and had no children from the wedlock.

The marriage between the parties was solemnised in August 2000. However, matrimonial litigation began as early as 2003 and has continued for over 22 years, the judgment observed, adding that despite mediation efforts ordered by the Supreme Court in 2012, no settlement was reached.

The bench said that prolonged separation without any hope of reunion itself amounts to cruelty.

Referring to a series of earlier decisions, the apex court said that where parties have been living separately for decades, the marriage becomes "only on paper".

"An unworkable marriage, which has ceased to be effective, is futile and bound to be a source of great misery to the parties," the judgment said, adding that refusal to sever such a legal tie "does not serve the sanctity of marriage, but may lead to mental cruelty".

Rejecting the Gauhati High Court’s view that the wife had not deserted the husband, the Supreme Court stressed that the case was not about fixing fault or blame but about recognising the reality of a dead marriage.

"No spouse can be compelled to resume life with a consort, and as such, nothing is gained by keeping the parties tied forever to a marriage which has, in fact, ceased to exist," the Justice Manmohan-led Bench reiterated.

The Supreme Court upheld the 2010 decree of divorce passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Judicial), Shillong, and set aside the Gauhati High Court’s judgment, formally dissolving the marriage.

"Accordingly, the order of the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Judicial) Shillong, insofar as it grants a decree of divorce to the parties, is upheld, and the impugned order of the High Court is set aside. With the aforesaid observations, the appeal stands allowed,” the apex court said.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalJewellery Associations To Meet PMO Officials On May 12, Says Report

EntertainmentKarishma Tanna says ‘walking’ helps her during pregnancy, urges ‘mamas to be’ to not ‘completely stop moving’

EntertainmentSumbul Touqeer on long working hours in television: It is important to get proper rest

NationalDelhi Police Crime Branch rescues two missing minor girls in separate operations

CricketPoor pace returns, catch drops: What has gone wrong for PBKS in mid-season slump?

National Realted Stories

NationalIAF Suryakiran aerobatics, green smoke trails; Chetak's flower shower mark Somnath Amrut Mahotsav

NationalCongress' Atul Patil critiques on PM Modi's 'seven appeals' over West Asia issue

NationalOmar Abdullah says leaving for Delhi to talk about statehood, LG's powers with HM Shah

National'Those who tried to erase Sanatan Dharma now reduced to dust': CM Yogi at Somnath Sankalp Mahotsav

NationalKeralam: Wild Buffalo that spread panic in Kannur captured after tranquiliser operation