City
Epaper

Centre notifies appointment of additional judge in Gauhati High Court

By IANS | Updated: November 9, 2023 16:55 IST

New Delhi, Nov 9 The Centre on Thursday issued a notification appointing advocate N. Unni Krishnan Nair as ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Nov 9 The Centre on Thursday issued a notification appointing advocate N. Unni Krishnan Nair as an additional judge of the Gauhati High Court, pursuant to a recommendation made by the Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud-led Supreme Court Collegium.

"In exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 224 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to appoint Ski N. Unni Krishnan Nair, to be an Additional Judge of the Gauhati High Court, for a period of two years with effect from the date he assumes charge of his office," said a notification issued by the Union Ministry of Law and Justice.

The Supreme Court Collegium had recommended Nair, along with advocate Kaushik Goswami, for appointment after the Collegium of the Gauhati High Court had unanimously forwarded its recommendation on May 29 this year.

Last week, the President had only appointed advocate Goswami to be an additional judge of the Gauhati High Court for a period of two years.

On Monday, the Supreme Court had asked the Centre to stop the selective 'pick and choose' approach in appointments to the higher judiciary and warned the Attorney General that it might pass orders on the judicial side which may not be "palatable" if this problem is not taken care of by the Union government.

The SC Collegium on October 18 said that it has consulted "colleagues conversant with the affairs of the Gauhati High Court to ascertain the fitness and suitability of these advocates for elevation".

In relation to advocate Krishnan Nair, all the four consultee-judges gave a positive opinion unanimously and noted that the candidate has extensive practice which is reflected in his substantially high professional income and a large number of reported judgments delivered in cases in which he appeared or argued.

Further, the SC Collegium brushed aside an adverse observation made by the Department of Justice in the file saying that the same should not come in the way of the recommendation of a candidate, particularly when the government in its assessment has fairly put on record a report that nothing adverse has come to notice against his integrity.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalUkraine calls Miami meetings "productive, constructive", discusses development of 20-point plan with US

InternationalIndian H-1B visa holders who flew back to renew work permits left stranded

InternationalEpstein files: US Department of Justice reposts President Trump's photo

InternationalPakistan: Man allegedly opens fire inside house; kills wife, two women, one minor

InternationalRussia launched 1300 drones, 1200 guided aerial bombs at Ukraine over past week: Zelenskyy

National Realted Stories

NationalBihar: Bagaha's Suman Devi scripts success story of self-reliance, earns lakhs through beekeeping

National'Nation first must guide thought and action', Arunachal Guv tells NCC cadets

NationalTurn Yoga and meditation into a mass movement for a healthy, balanced society: Gujarat CM

NationalKCR announces mass movement over irrigation projects

NationalChains of Commerce: How Britain’s need for gold forced ‘circuitous route’ that crushed India’s trade (From the Archives)