City
Epaper

Centre notifies appointment of additional judge in Gauhati High Court

By IANS | Updated: November 9, 2023 16:55 IST

New Delhi, Nov 9 The Centre on Thursday issued a notification appointing advocate N. Unni Krishnan Nair as ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Nov 9 The Centre on Thursday issued a notification appointing advocate N. Unni Krishnan Nair as an additional judge of the Gauhati High Court, pursuant to a recommendation made by the Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud-led Supreme Court Collegium.

"In exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 224 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to appoint Ski N. Unni Krishnan Nair, to be an Additional Judge of the Gauhati High Court, for a period of two years with effect from the date he assumes charge of his office," said a notification issued by the Union Ministry of Law and Justice.

The Supreme Court Collegium had recommended Nair, along with advocate Kaushik Goswami, for appointment after the Collegium of the Gauhati High Court had unanimously forwarded its recommendation on May 29 this year.

Last week, the President had only appointed advocate Goswami to be an additional judge of the Gauhati High Court for a period of two years.

On Monday, the Supreme Court had asked the Centre to stop the selective 'pick and choose' approach in appointments to the higher judiciary and warned the Attorney General that it might pass orders on the judicial side which may not be "palatable" if this problem is not taken care of by the Union government.

The SC Collegium on October 18 said that it has consulted "colleagues conversant with the affairs of the Gauhati High Court to ascertain the fitness and suitability of these advocates for elevation".

In relation to advocate Krishnan Nair, all the four consultee-judges gave a positive opinion unanimously and noted that the candidate has extensive practice which is reflected in his substantially high professional income and a large number of reported judgments delivered in cases in which he appeared or argued.

Further, the SC Collegium brushed aside an adverse observation made by the Department of Justice in the file saying that the same should not come in the way of the recommendation of a candidate, particularly when the government in its assessment has fairly put on record a report that nothing adverse has come to notice against his integrity.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Entertainment'Kantara Chapter 1' Public Review by IANS: Lengthy runtime and dull VFX fail to impress, despite Rishab Shetty’s performance

NationalPM Modi speaks to Cong chief Mallikarjun Kharge, wishes him speedy recovery

BusinessSamsung, SK hynix to supply chips to OpenAI

NationalHeavy rain likely in coastal Andhra as depression intensifies

TechnologyCabinet nod for Rs 6,957 cr infrastructure project in Assam to boost eco-tourism, jobs: Minister

National Realted Stories

NationalBadrinath Temple Prepares to Shut Its Doors for Winter on This Date – Last Chance for Devotees!

NationalESIC issues guidelines of New Amnesty Scheme to settle court cases

NationalWomen celebrate ‘Sindoor Khela’ on Vijayadashami marking conclusion of Durga Puja

NationalHas cautioned govt to stay on right path: Rashid Alvi on Mohan Bhagwat's 'external interference' warning

NationalGST 2.0: Empowering livelihoods and growth in Uttar Pradesh