City
Epaper

Defamation case: K'taka court directs Rahul Gandhi to appear on June 7

By IANS | Updated: June 1, 2024 23:00 IST

Bengaluru, June 1 A Special MP/MLA court in Karnataka on Saturday directed Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to appear ...

Open in App

Bengaluru, June 1 A Special MP/MLA court in Karnataka on Saturday directed Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to appear before it on June 7 in connection with a defamation case filed by Karnataka BJP MLC and former state unit general secretary Keshav Prasad.

The defamation suit filed by Prasad alleges that Congress engaged in propaganda by publishing full-page advertisements accusing the previous BJP government in the state of charging a 40 per cent commission, for providing government projects.

Keshav Prasad stated that during the Assembly elections, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and his deputy, D.K. Shivakumar have made false allegations and misguided the people of the state. It was pleaded to punish them under IPC Section 500 for making false charges.

The court has reserved its order on whether to issue a non-bailable warrant against Rahul Gandhi.

Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar appeared before the court in the same case and obtained bail.

Rahul Gandhi, who is also a party to the case, remained absent despite giving an undertaking to the court that he would appear on Saturday.

S.A. Ahmed, the counsel for Rahul Gandhi, submitted that his client could not appear in court due to the seventh phase of voting and a meeting of INDIA bloc leaders.

He assured the court that Rahul Gandhi will appear on June 7.

Ramesh Babu, another counsel for Rahul Gandhi, pleaded to the court not to issue an order until June 7, and to grant the Wayanad MP another date for appearance -- the third such request.

BJP counsel Vinod Kumar objected to these demands and urged the court to issue a non-bailable arrest warrant against Rahul Gandhi.

Counsel Ahmed countered that the court has the authority to grant Rahul Gandhi time for his appearance.

After hearing their arguments, the court adjourned, reserving its order on the issue.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessAdani Group stocks surge up to 5 pc after US legal proceedings close

CricketSachin Tendulkar urges young cricketers to focus on discipline and preparation, parents to give them freedom

NationalAhmedabad Crime Branch arrests jewellery store employee in Rs 1.66 crore gold theft case

National"Operation Sindoor delivered military precision..." Army Chief hails Indian armed forces

BusinessStock Market Today: Sensex Jumps 343 Points, Nifty Crosses 23,750 As IT Stocks Lead Market Rally

National Realted Stories

NationalTell truth about fuel, LPG supply: Ashok Gehlot to Rajasthan govt

NationalTelangana raises upper age limit by 10 years for direct recruitment jobs

NationalDelhi-NCR taxi, auto drivers announce three-day strike from May 21 over fare hike demand

NationalCM Siddaramaiah hails Cong govt’s three-year journey ahead of celebratory event

National"Strengthening Delhi's infrastructure, enhancing ease of living for citizens remain central to our vision": Piyush Goyal after meeting LG Sandhu