City
Epaper

Delhi court rejects anticipatory bail plea of Luthra brothers

By IANS | Updated: December 11, 2025 18:15 IST

New Delhi, Dec 11 A Delhi court on Thursday rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Gaurav and Saurabh ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Dec 11 A Delhi court on Thursday rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Gaurav and Saurabh Luthra, owners of the Birch by Romeo Lane nightclub in Goa, where a recent fire claimed 25 lives.

The plea was filed before the Rohini court even as the brothers -- who left India shortly after the incident -- were detained in Thailand.

During the hearing, Goa Police counsel Abhinav Mukherjee argued that the brothers had falsely claimed minimal involvement in the business and said their travel abroad was pre-planned.

Police presented multiple documents contradicting the Luthra duo's claims, including the FSSAI application filed by Saurabh Luthra, a Pollution Control Board application, and GST records showing both brothers and Ajay Gupta as partners.

Police further informed the court that the establishment’s Panchayat license had expired and was not renewed, and that the business was operating without valid permission.

The license agreement was also shown as proof that they lacked authorisation to run the venue.

The prosecution maintained that the brothers booked their flight at 1.15 a.m. shortly after the fire, and flew to Thailand on December 7 at 5 a.m., calling the move an attempt to evade arrest.

Their mother and wife allegedly told police they were unaware of the brothers’ whereabouts and did not have their phone numbers. Subsequently, non-bailable warrants, a Look Out Circular, and a Blue Corner Notice were issued, the prosecution said.

Goa Police also told the court that the Luthras were responsible for running the nightclub with only one narrow exit and had organised the fire show that preceded the blaze.

The Luthra brothers’ lawyer, Tanveer Ahmed, on the other hand, argued that the siblings were being portrayed as fugitives even though they had informed their travel agent of their plans on December 6.

He said that properties belonging to the family were being vandalised and alleged personal vendetta by government agencies, claiming a threat to their lives. Ahmed said his clients would return to India regardless of the verdict.

Ahmed said that the Luthra brothers are businessmen, and they are not people who fled the country after committing a Rs 5,000 crore financial fraud.

The devastating fire, which broke out on Saturday night, killed 25 people and left six injured. Nearly 100 people were present in the club at the time. Initial investigations point to the heavy use of inflammable materials in the décor and gross violations of fire safety norms as the cause of the tragedy.

A swift multi-agency operation, which stretched across two countries, eventually led to the detention in Thailand of the Luthras.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Politics"Great, revolutionary decision": Union Minister Athawale on Women's Reservation Bill

MumbaiMumbai Bengaluru Vande Bharat Sleeper Gets Nod; Route Includes Pune, Solapur Stations

InternationalIran denies US claims of mine clearing ships' passage through St of Hormuz

NationalRahul Gandhi flags off 'Run for Ambedkar, Run for Constitution' marathon in Delhi

NationalTelangana: Speeding car critically injures 2 girls in Meerpet; Police launch investigation

National Realted Stories

NationalIndia surrounded by various hostile actors, optimum resource utilisation is need of the hour: Rajnath Singh

National"People are getting employment from this...": MP CM Mohan Yadav at New Year Fair

NationalUttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath pays tribute to Maharana Sanga on his birth anniversary, calls him an inspiration

National"This run is to save our Constitution": Congress' Charanjit Channi on 'Run For Ambedkar, Run For Constitution' marathon

NationalPuratchi ADMK files complaint against AIADMK over election campaign permission denial