In the suit moved through advocate Vijay Aggarwal, Singhvi had sought to restrain the accused from making any further defamatory statement or sell the book till the pendency of the case.
District Judge Sanjeev Jain on Monday passed the directions till further orders on a suit filed by Singhvi against Zaiwalla for allegedly defaming his family by linking his father L M Singhvi to Bofors case in his book. The judge said that a strong "prima facie" was made out in favour of Singhvi and that his reputation was at stake.
"His reputation would suffer irreparable harm if injunctions prayed for is not granted as much as he would suffer further loss to his reputation," the judge said while slated the matter for May 4 for further hearing.
The court also noted that in the instant case, the reputation of the plaintiff is at stake. "His reputation would suffer irreparable harm if injunctions as prayed foris not granted as much as he would suffer further loss to his reputation a strong prima facie case is made out in favour of the plaintiff," it said."The defendant is accordingly restrained from making any further unvaried unsubstantiated, and ex-factor defamatory statements concerning the plaintiff and his family, or repeating and republishing the statements made in the article and reproduced in the plaint... during the pendency fit he present suit," the court mentioned in the order copy.
"Similarly other dependents (publishers and distributors of the book) are restrained from marketing or supplying the book to individuals and book venders/sellers for reading or further re-sale during the pendency of the present suit till the next date of hearing," the court said.
A Delhi court had earlier summoned Zaiwalla, asking him to appear on May 29 in the defamation complaint in the same case.
The court order had came after perusing the testimonies of the witnesses and considering the original documentary evidence on record.
According to the complaint, the book titled 'Honour Bound ~ Adventures of an Indian Lawyer in the English Courts' had made certain "unverified" and "false" statements against Singhvi and his family.
( With inputs from ANI )