City
Epaper

Delhi Court seeks police's reply on Umar Khalid's fresh bail plea

By ANI | Updated: September 6, 2021 15:10 IST

A Delhi Court on Monday asked the Police to file a reply on the fresh bail application of Umar Khalid.

Open in App

A Delhi Court on Monday asked the Police to file a reply on the fresh bail application of Umar Khalid.

Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat asked the Police to file a reply and listed the matter for further hearing on September 8.

Umar Khalid's counsel has moved his bail plea under Section 437 under the Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) after withdrawing the bail plea which was filed under Section 439 of CrPC.

Khalid's counsel withdrew the plea when Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad, appearing for Delhi Police, raised objection on the maintainability of the plea filed under Section 439 CrPC.

Earlier also, accused Ishrat Jahan and Khalid Saifi also withdrew their bail pleas under Section 439 of CrPC and later filed them under Section 437 the CrPC.

Student activist Umar Khalid's lawyer on Friday called the charge sheet filed by Delhi Police under the charges of UAPA in a larger conspiracy case as a script of Amazon Prime show 'Family Man', having no evidence to support the allegations.

Khalid's lawyer Trideep Pais told Additional Session Judge Amitabh Rawat, that the charge sheet makes rhetorical allegations against Khalid without any fact, and makes his client a "veteran of sedition".

Advocate Pais, who was arguing Khalid's bail plea, has said that there was nothing in Khalid's speech that was sedition of any kind.

While reading the part of the charge sheet, Pais pointed out "the author of the charge sheet was acting like a scriptwriter from the Amazon Prime show, Family Man." He also questioned inconsistent statements given by witnesses in the matter.

The Special Cell of Delhi Police has filed a charge sheet against various accused including Khalid under the provisions of UAPA, under the various section dealing with murder and others of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3 & 4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and Section 25/27 Arms Act.

Besides this case, Khalid is also facing charges in various cases pertaining to Northeast Delhi violence matters.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Amitabh rawatUmar KhalidDelhi CourtDelhi PoliceDelhi home department
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi CA Found Dead in Airbnb; Rare Suicide Involving Helium Gas Reported

NationalDelhi: Over 20 Schools Receive Bomb Threat Emails, Say Police

NationalBomb Threat in Delhi: Threatening Emails Sent to St Thomas School and Vasant Valley School in Dwarka

NationalDelhi: Semi-Decomposed Body of Missing AIIMS Electrician Found in Vasant Kunj Pond

NationalRomil Vohra Encounter: Wanted Criminal Carrying Rs 3 Lakh Bounty Killed Near Haryana-Delhi Border

National Realted Stories

NationalKalyan Banerjee attacks Mahua Moitra after announcing his resignation as party Chief Whip in LS

NationalMumbai Metro lines 2A and 7 cross 200 million rides: Official

NationalMinister Sirsa visits Norway e-waste facility to plan eco park in Delhi

NationalJamnagar homes shine with PM Surya Ghar scheme, power bills drop sharply

NationalTelangana to act on Kaleshwaram Commission report after debate in Assembly