City
Epaper

Delhi HC asks NIA to file response to Engineer Rashid’s bail plea

By IANS | Updated: May 15, 2025 17:07 IST

Delhi, May 15 The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought the response of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) ...

Open in App

Delhi, May 15 The Delhi High Court on Thursday sought the response of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) to jailed MP Engineer Rashid’s application moved in a terror funding case against him by the investigating agency.

The Bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar issued the notice to NIA on Rashid's appeal challenging a trial court's refusal to grant him regular bail in the matter.

Rashid has been in jail since 2019 in the terror funding case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

In 2024, Rashid won the Baramulla Lok Sabha seat by defeating incumbent Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah by over two lakh votes.

He was later granted interim bail to campaign during the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly elections.

In March this year, Additional Sessions Judge, Chander Jit Singh of Patiala House Court denied regular bail to the MP. Rashid has previously also been granted custody parole to attend the Parliament proceedings.

On Thursday, the High Court also heard a plea filed by Rashid to challenge the criminal charges framed against him by the trial court. NIA objected to this plea, stating that it had been filed after a considerable delay.

“There is a substantial delay in this matter. There is a delay of 1100 days”, Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Akshai Malik submitted.

Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra, who also appeared in the matter for the NIA and argued, "The mandate of law is that delay beyond 90 days cannot be condoned. He will have to explain the grounds for the delay. There is a substantial delay. This is something I am opposing."

In response, the counsel representing Rashid argued that the delay can be condoned by the Court.

"90-day period is not sacrosanct and the power to condone is with the Court, especially when matters relate to life and liberty," he said.

The Court asked that a reply be filed on the limited point of condonation of delay and listed the matter for hearing on July 29. Advocates Aditya Wadhwa and Vikhyat Oberoi represented Engineer Rashid.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalIndia votes in favour of France-Saudi-backed "New York Declaration"

AurangabadWhy new works in GMCH’s surgical building? Only essential repairs to be prioritized now

InternationalCharlie Kirk Shooting Suspect Tyler Robinson Threatened Suicide After Father Confrontation: Report

Other SportsPKL 12: Bengaluru Bulls register third win on the trot

AurangabadGuardian minister presents ‘zilla shikshak’ award

National Realted Stories

NationalNeed to explore the past through technology: PM Modi

NationalBJD slams Mohan Majhi-led govt over fertiliser shortage in Odisha

NationalFully committed to inclusive, all-round development of Manipur: PM Modi

NationalKerala: CPI-M leaders on defensive after DYFI leader’s audio leak sparks row

NationalBihar: SSB Apprehend 70 Escaped Nepali Jail Inmates Near India-Nepal Border