City
Epaper

Delhi HC directs Google to suspend misleading Starbucks Franchise Google Forms

By IANS | Updated: January 24, 2024 12:25 IST

New Delhi, Jan 24 The Delhi High Court has issued a directive asking Google to suspend URLs associated ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 24 The Delhi High Court has issued a directive asking Google to suspend URLs associated with various Google Forms inviting the public to apply for a 'Starbucks Franchise'.

Justice Anish Dayal said that Starbucks, which has filed the suit, is authorised to file an affidavit listing similar URLs of Google Forms. Google is then expected to suspend those URLs upon receiving the information.

Starbucks, which has gone against unidentified entities falsely claiming to be its franchisees, reiterated that an interim injunction had been granted in favour of Starbucks in April of the previous year.

The fresh application aims to restrain impostors who were posing as 'Starbucks Franchise' through Google Forms.

Notably, Starbucks, the multinational coffeehouse chain, does not operate on a franchise model in India.

"Counsel for the plaintiffs, therefore, states that the imposters are seeking information from general public to apply for Starbucks Franchise opportunities, which as noted above does not exist in India," the court noted.

These fraudulent forms, with headings such as 'StarBucks franchise', misled individuals into believing they could apply for Starbucks franchises in India.

The court affirmed Starbucks' entitlement to relief, citing concerns about the misuse of Google Forms by impostors to gather information related to a nonexistent Starbucks franchise in India.

Additionally, the court stressed the impropriety of seeking private information and data from the general public through such deceptive means.

It noted: "In the opinion of this Court, the plaintiffs would be entitled to the relief they seek in this application, on account of not only that these Google Forms are being posted by imposters in order to elicit information relating to Starbucks franchise (which do not exist in India) as well as seeking private information and data from the general public, which cannot be countenanced."

Justice Dayal concluded that if Google has reservations about specific URLs, they can respond to Starbucks, and if necessary, approach the court for further adjudication and relief.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

Other SportsIPL 2026: 'It's good to be in that position,' says Sangakkara on RR's unbeaten run

Other SportsBadminton Asia Championships: Ayush Shetty topples World No. 4 Jonatan Christie, storms into semifinals

NationalWomen voters outshine men in all 3 states; set turnout record in Assam, Puducherry: ECI data

Politics"DMK has fulfilled only 15% of its 511 election promises, but is lying about 99%": Annamalai at Ooty election campaign

NationalDelhi CM takes part in signature campaign for Women's Reservation Bill; urges for role of females in policy-making

National Realted Stories

NationalAIBA urges careful consideration of Justice Verma's resignation to preserve Parliamentary process

NationalKolkata: Arms dealer arrested in Police raid; Firearms and Cartridges recovered

NationalDay after Kerala polling, BJP’s father-son duo express ire at Church

NationalRelease pension, arrears of two disqualified ex-MLAs, says Himachal High Court

NationalNitin Gadkari urges modern tech, faster clearances to cut India’s construction costs