City
Epaper

Delhi HC directs Google to suspend misleading Starbucks Franchise Google Forms

By IANS | Updated: January 24, 2024 12:25 IST

New Delhi, Jan 24 The Delhi High Court has issued a directive asking Google to suspend URLs associated ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 24 The Delhi High Court has issued a directive asking Google to suspend URLs associated with various Google Forms inviting the public to apply for a 'Starbucks Franchise'.

Justice Anish Dayal said that Starbucks, which has filed the suit, is authorised to file an affidavit listing similar URLs of Google Forms. Google is then expected to suspend those URLs upon receiving the information.

Starbucks, which has gone against unidentified entities falsely claiming to be its franchisees, reiterated that an interim injunction had been granted in favour of Starbucks in April of the previous year.

The fresh application aims to restrain impostors who were posing as 'Starbucks Franchise' through Google Forms.

Notably, Starbucks, the multinational coffeehouse chain, does not operate on a franchise model in India.

"Counsel for the plaintiffs, therefore, states that the imposters are seeking information from general public to apply for Starbucks Franchise opportunities, which as noted above does not exist in India," the court noted.

These fraudulent forms, with headings such as 'StarBucks franchise', misled individuals into believing they could apply for Starbucks franchises in India.

The court affirmed Starbucks' entitlement to relief, citing concerns about the misuse of Google Forms by impostors to gather information related to a nonexistent Starbucks franchise in India.

Additionally, the court stressed the impropriety of seeking private information and data from the general public through such deceptive means.

It noted: "In the opinion of this Court, the plaintiffs would be entitled to the relief they seek in this application, on account of not only that these Google Forms are being posted by imposters in order to elicit information relating to Starbucks franchise (which do not exist in India) as well as seeking private information and data from the general public, which cannot be countenanced."

Justice Dayal concluded that if Google has reservations about specific URLs, they can respond to Starbucks, and if necessary, approach the court for further adjudication and relief.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalIndia, Netherlands agree to set up Joint Trade and Investment Committee; sign key MoUs during Dutch FM's visit

Other Sports5th T20I: Chakaravarthy, Bumrah star as India beat SA by 30 runs, clinch series 3-1

NationalChandrababu Naidu meets HM Amit Shah, discusses Andhra projects

CricketIndia defeat South Africa by 30 runs in high-scoring clash to win eighth successive T20I series; Pandya, Tilak Varma shine

NationalKarnataka Hate Speech Regulation Bill: Union Minister Shobha Karandlaje urges Governor to withhold assent

National Realted Stories

NationalHijab incident: Complaint filed against Nitish Kumar, Sanjay Nishad; hearing on Jan 3

NationalBihar: Kidnapping case of Dr Sajal Kumar cracked; 6 arrested

NationalBihar: 4 policemen injured during liquor raid in Supaul

NationalCM Mohan Majhi pitches vision of AI-powered Odisha at Regional AI Impact Conference

NationalGujarat CM Bhupendra Patel meets PM Modi, describes interaction as ‘highly energising’