City
Epaper

Delhi HC dismisses plea against construction of ITL Twin Tower, slaps Rs 25,000 fine on petitioner

By ANI | Updated: September 3, 2020 12:50 IST

Dismissing a plea challenging the construction of ITL Twin Tower in Pitampura's Netaji Subhash Palace area, the Delhi High Court on Thursday slapped a fine of Rs 25,000 against the petitioner for filing a frivolous petition by way of a PIL.

Open in App

Dismissing a plea challenging the construction of ITL Twin Tower in Pitampura's Netaji Subhash Palace area, the Delhi High Court on Thursday slapped a fine of Rs 25,000 against the petitioner for filing a frivolous petition by way of a PIL.

A division bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan refused to entertain the petition and asked the petitioner to deposit the fine amount with the Delhi Legal Service Authority (DLSA). The High Court noted that the petition seems to not be a public interest litigation (PIL).

The bench was hearing a plea seeking action against the concerned authorities and to issue directions to demolish the illegal construction and restore the ITL Twin Tower to its original structure. The plea also sought to stop the work as a danger to residents and passersby.

In the PIL, the petitioner prayed that respondents be held accountable for all violations of constitutional and legislative guarantees, which resulted in denying the poverty-stricken slum dwellers their right to a healthy environment and no illegal construction, especially where people visit regularity and that an independent inquiry is ordered to look into the violations.

It alleged that when the country was facing the COVID-19 pandemic, the owner of ITL Twin Tower was taking undue advantage of the situation, misleading the government and the department was taking undue benefit arising out of bad times of the nation.

"The owner of the abovesaid mall is constructing two another floors on the building of that mall by virtue of taking benefit of COVID-19 pandemic as he is very well aware of the fact that all the departments and servants are busy in giving their service of the nation to prevent the spread of novel coronavirus," the plea said.

It also said that the said building is 30 years old structure and therefore inquiry may kindly be conducted on the behest of re-construction after 30 years without any approval.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Delhi legal service authorityPrateek jalanDelhi High CourtDelhi delhi high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi High Court: Disruption of Parliament viewed as a serious threat

NationalDelhi HC Stays Release of Vijay Raaz’s Udaipur Files Until Centre Decides on Certification Review

National2023 Parliament Security Breach Case: Accused Neelam Azad and Mahesh Kumawat Granted Bail by Delhi High Court

NationalRCB Approaches Delhi High Court Against Uber Over Advertisement Featuring Travis Head

NationalSupreme Court Judges Unanimously Agreed To Declare Their Assets

National Realted Stories

NationalKarti Chidambaram backs India's firm rebuttal to Trump's tariff move

NationalOdisha to set up 835 model primary schools in first phase of flagship scheme

NationalHow US encouraged India to buy Russian oil to stabilise global energy markets

NationalDelhi Crime: Girl Shot Dead Inside Doctor’s Clinic in Jahangirpuri; Attacker on the Run

NationalCong's Manish Tewari invokes 1971 to counter US tariff move on India