City
Epaper

Delhi HC Judge recuses from hearing bail plea of UAPA accused

By IANS | Updated: January 10, 2023 13:45 IST

New Delhi, Jan 10 Justice Siddharth Mridul of the Delhi High Court on Tuesday recused from hearing the ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 10 Justice Siddharth Mridul of the Delhi High Court on Tuesday recused from hearing the plea moved by Manzer Imam, a purported Indian Mujahideen operative.

Imam is booked under anti-terror law, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

"In all the bans imposed on the organizations at that time, I was the Senior Counsel for the Government, so I can't hear the matter," Justice Mridul said.

The matter is listed for hearing on January 13 before another bench.

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) filed a case against Imam in August 2013 stating that he and others conspired to commit terrorist activities and made plans to target important locations in the nation.

Imam recently received a bail denial from the trial court. In October last year, a single judge requested that his bail application be heard and decided by the special court within 75 days.

"The Special Court will hear and dispose of the bail application of the applicant within 75 days from the date of this order," the court had ordered.

Justice Mridul acknowledged his difficulty in hearing the appeal when Imam's counsel said that the accused had been in detention for nine years and that the charges against him had been re-filed. He had further stated that there are 369 witnesses, and many of them are yet to be examined.

"In some of the bans imposed on SIMI (Students' Islamic Movement of India)... for a period of two years I was a senior counsel for the government. Would I hear this matter?...There is a difficulty," said Justice Mridul.

However, on November 28, Additional Sessions Judge Shailender Malik ruled that the trial's delay in this case could not be used as a defence to grant bail.

The court had denied Imam's request for bail but stated that there was sufficient proof to conclude that his accusation was true. Because the trial was taking so long, Imam had asked for bail.

The FIR in which Imam is an accused invokes Section 17, 18, 18B and 20 of UAPA and Section 121A and 123 of Indian Penal Code.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Shailender malikDelhi High CourtNational Investigation AgencySiddharth mridulDelhi delhi high courtSpecial national investigation agencyKochi national investigation agencyNational investigationInvestigation agencyKolkata special task forceThe national investigation agency
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalTMC MP Mahua Moitra Approaches Delhi High Court Against Ex-Boyfriend Over Custody of Pet Dog Henry

Entertainment‘Celebrities Aren’t Public Property’: Vivek Oberoi’s Lawyer Sana Raees Khan Hails HC Order Protecting His Personality Rights

NationalDelhi Demolition Drive: 5 Cops Injured After Clashes Erupt Over Bulldozer Action Near Faiz-e-Elahi Masjid

EntertainmentSuperstar NTR Secures Landmark Legal Protection for Personality Rights; Actor Thanks Delhi HC Court In Appreciation Post

BusinessAnil Ambani's Reliance Power and Reliance Infra Shares in Focus on Monday After Delhi HC Grants Major Relief in Union Bank Fraud Case

National Realted Stories

National14.5 kg of IED recovered & neutralised in J&K's Shopian, averts major terror incident

NationalOver 23 lakh pilgrims paid obeisance at J&K's Shri Mata Vaishno Devi Shrine in 2026

NationalIAEA Director General praises India's major nuclear milestone at Kalpakkam

NationalNIA spl court sentences four Bangladeshi nationals in transnational human trafficking case

NationalED conducts search at premises of Kolkata-based realty firm Merlin Group on PMLA charges